Comparison between two devices for securing airway access in patients undergoing general anaesthesia using fiber optic tool
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/01/061684
- Lead Sponsor
- Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences PGIMS,Rohtak
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
One Hundred patients of either sex aged 18-60 years belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 or 2 scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation will be included in the study
Exclusion Criteria
Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, mouth opening <2.5cms, Body mass index >30kgm-2, pregnancy, risk of aspiration, anticipated difficult airway will be excluded from the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Success of intubation using fibreoptic bronchoscopy between 2 devices-ILMA and ILTSTimepoint: Baseline(T0)-MAP(mmHg),HR(min),spO2(%) After Induction(T1)MAP(mmHg),HR(min),spO2(%) After Insertion(T2)MAP(mmHg),HR(min),spO2(%) After Intubation(T3)MAP(mmHg),HR(min),spO2(%)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method • Success of placement of LMA <br/ ><br>• Time taken for supraglottic placement <br/ ><br>• Time taken for intubation <br/ ><br>• Number of attempts for supraglottic and ETT placement <br/ ><br>• Haemodynamic variation <br/ ><br>• Complications secondary to device placementTimepoint: Assessment of Mean Arterial Pressures, Heart Rate and Oxygen saturation will be done at Baseline, at Induction, at Insertion of supraglottic device and after Intubation. Post-operative complications-immediately,after half hour and after 1 hour will be assessed. Data compiled and appropriate statistical tests will be applied to analyse the results.