Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06740292
NCT06740292CompletedPhase 4

InterFlex Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates in the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Alexandria University1 site in 1 country18 target enrollmentStarted: January 25, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
18
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Radiographic evaluation for the assessment of mean bone density at the fracture line

Study Overview

Brief Summary

the study aims to compare InterFlex plate with conventional miniplates in management of symphyseal mandibular fracture clinically regarding pain, wound healing and postoperative occlusion, and radiographically regrading bone density.

Detailed Description

A total of 18 patients with recent symphyseal mandibular fractures were allocated into two groups. Group A, comprising 9 patients, underwent treatment with the InterFlex plate, while Group B, also consisting of 9 patients, was treated with conventional two miniplates. Clinical evaluations were carried at multiple intervals up to 12 weeks postoperatively, with radiographic assessments performed immediately after surgery and at 12 weeks to measure mean bone density at the fracture line.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Investigator)

Masking Description

Patients were allocated in a 1:1 ratio using an on-site computer software system with concealed allocation through sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE). Group A was treated with InterFlex plates, and Group B with conventional miniplates

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •patients with recent anterior mandibular fracture located between the mental foramina.
  • •adults without gender predilection who agreed to follow-up,
  • •fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation, and
  • •those medically fit for general anesthesia were included

Exclusion Criteria

  • •medically compromised patients,
  • •fractures with infection,
  • •pathological or old fractures,
  • •completely edentulous patients,
  • •comminuted fractures

Arms & Interventions

Patients with anterior mandibular fracture managed with conventional miniplates

Active Comparator

Patients with anterior mandibular fracture managed with conventional miniplates

Intervention: conventional miniplates (Device)

Patients with anterior mandibular fracture managed with InterFlex plates

Experimental

Patients with anterior mandibular fracture managed with InterFlex plates

Intervention: InterFlex plates (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Radiographic evaluation for the assessment of mean bone density at the fracture line

Time Frame: 3 months

Mean bone density at the fracture line was assessed using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scan in Hounsfield Units (HU)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Clinical evaluation for pain(six weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials