跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01971073
NCT01971073终止不适用

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences on Cognitive Inhibition in Schizophrenia

Bar-Ilan University, Israel2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2015年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
发起方
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
Progression score on cognitive tasks

研究概览

简要总结

A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant responses and to adopt relevant responses instead. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001). The aim of this study is to test whether bilateral tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks.

详细描述

A deficit in cognitive suppression is a trait of patients with schizophrenia. Cognitive suppression is the ability to control or suppress irrelevant information and to adopt relevant responses instead. This ability is a basic skill which is essential to maintain a normal well-adjusted life. We need to suppress distracting information in order to focus attention, to suppress irrelevant cues in order to retrieve particular memories, and to suppress habitual responses in order to make adaptive choices (Dillon & Pizzagalli, 2007). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on information suppression in schizophrenic patients. This is a noninvasive technique of brain stimulation that induces prolonged functional changes in the cerebral cortex through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp (Nitsche & Paulus, 2001; Nitsche et al., 2003, 2004; Antal et al., 2004). The aim of this study is to test whether anodal and cathodal tDCS differentially modify performance on several cognitive tasks when applied to the left/right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

Sixty patients will be divided into four groups: 1) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 2) 15 schizophrenic subjects in a sham tDCS group; 3) 15 healthy subjects in a tDCS treatment group; 4) 15 healthy subjects in a sham tDCS group. All participants will complete baseline tests including an n-back test, the Hayling test and metaphoric comprehension test. The schizophrenic subjects only, will complete a bank of cognitive tests as a baseline (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The first meeting for the schizophrenic subjects only will be used to determine the best stimulation area (right/left DLPFC) and type (anodal/ cathodal). Schizophrenic subjects in both the treatment and the control groups will undergo six treatment sessions in total. The cognitive tests will be given to all participants once again at the end of the study. In order to evaluate improvement between the pre-test and the post-test, differences in reaction times and error rate will be calculated for each participant.

This study is important for few reasons. First, this study focus on the difficulty of suppressing irrelevant information, executive function ability essential to leading a normal life. Special populations, and specifically people with schizophrenia, have difficulty suppressing irrelevant information, and a correlation has been noted between this characteristic and weak executive functioning capabilities. In this study we evaluate the potential of minimizing these difficulties through use of tDCS. This particular tool was chosen for the study because it is easy to use, non-invasive, and painless. Research has shown that tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC can improve performance in cognitive tasks, a result that has not been mirrored through use of medications. Second, in recognition of the heterogeneity of schizophrenic patients (substantiated by the fact that the success of other treatments varies from patient to patient), our study will perform tests to identify the preferred stimulation region, DLPFC left/right. The results will help determine more specifically if there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of the region responsible for suppressing irrelevant information . Related to this, we will be able to assess the impact of stimulation, including whether or not stimulation benefits all schizophrenic patients or, alternatively, if there are unknown variables involved which determine the relative success of this treatment amongst individuals. In addition, we will be able to explore differences or correlations between healthy subjects' verbal abilities in relation to the various tests conducted, and assess the impact of these tests on healthy subjects' cognitive inhibition and working memory. Finally, this study is critical because if the treatment method proves to be successful, we would be able to extend this study to other populations that have difficulties with executive functioning, and in addition, to examine the effect of electrical stimulation on other cognitive abilities.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 55 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • must be 18 years old or above.
  • Clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • must be with a stable mental status as demonstrated by a stable Positive and -Negative Symptom Score (PANSS) score over a period of 2 weeks.
  • must have no medication changes in the 2 weeks prior to obtaining informed consent.
  • must be able to give informed consent for the trial.

排除标准

  • Unwilling or unable, in the opinion of the Investigator, to comply with study instructions
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • current DSM-V substance or alcohol abuse.
  • Concurrent delirium
  • mental retardation
  • drug-induced psychosis
  • history of clinically significant brain trauma documented by CT or MRI.
  • epilepsy or had seizures 6 months prior the beginning of the study

研究组 & 干预措施

bilateral Anodal-L/R Cathodal-R/L tDCS

Experimental

bilateral Anodal-left and cathodal-right tDCS over DLPFC or bilateral Anodal-right and cathodal-left tDCS over DLPFC.

Intervention: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

干预措施: transcranial direct current stimulation (Device)

Sham tDCS

Sham Comparator

Sham tDCS

干预措施: sham tDCS (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Progression score on cognitive tasks

时间窗: two years

Improve performance in cognitive tasks in particular, higher scores on the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in the post vs. before intervention tests.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Bar-Ilan University, Israel
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nira Mashal

Dr. Mashal, PI

Bar-Ilan University, Israel

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Influences... | 临床试验