跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01965938
NCT01965938已完成不适用

RIFL (Rigid and Flexing Laryngoscope) vs. Fiberoptic Bronchoscope: A Comparison of the Ease of Use During Intubation on Difficult Airways

Vanderbilt University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 41 人开始时间: 2012年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
41
试验地点
2
主要终点
Time Until Proper Endotracheal Tube Placement

研究概览

简要总结

We will conduct a randomized trial comparing the success rate and time to intubation using the RIFL vs. the fiberoptic bronchoscope, as the latter is commonly held to be the gold standard of difficult airway devices. Specifically, we wish to compare the of intubation between the two devices in patients with potentially difficult airways as defined by an oropharyngeal class 3-4, BMI greater than 35, or in patients with a history of difficult intubation using direct laryngoscopy.

详细描述

Patients who require general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation will be identified the night prior to their surgery based upon the examination documented in their preoperative history and physical. If their body mass index achieves a calculated score of 35 or greater or they have an oropharyngeal class 4 airway then they will qualify to participate.

After written informed consent is obtained, The intubation method would be randomized as one of two groups: intubation via use of the fiberoptic bronchoscope or the RIFL. The intubation attempt will be terminated if the SpO2 <90, HR<50, there is traumatic injury, or time > 100sec. If terminated, the patient will be mask ventilated and the attending anesthesiologist would determine the subsequent technique that will be used for airway management.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with known or suspected difficult airways defined as:
  • patients with an oropharyngeal score of 3 or 4
  • patients whose body mass index calculates greater to or equal to 35

排除标准

  • Patients who necessitate an awake fiberoptic intubation or a rapid sequence intubation.

结局指标

主要结局

Time Until Proper Endotracheal Tube Placement

时间窗: usually <100 seconds

Time (in seconds) from first placement of the intubating scope in the oral cavity until proper endotracheal tube placement is confirmed by the presence of End Tidal Co2 (etCO2). Time to successful intubation was defined as the period from when the tip of the RIFL or FOB passed the incisors until withdrawal past that same point after successful intubation.

次要结局

  • Grade of Glottic View(<100 seconds)
  • Lowest Pulse Oximetry Saturation Value Reading During Intubation(<100 seconds)
  • Number of Participants With Successful Intubation(<100 seconds)
  • Number of Attempts Performed During Airway Management(<100 seconds)
  • Assistance Maneuvers, if Any, Provided by the Attending Anesthesiologist(<100 seconds)
  • Alternate Device Used(<100 seconds)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Bret Alvis

Clinical Fellow

Vanderbilt University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验