Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NL-OMON42236
NL-OMON42236
Completed
Not Applicable

The differences in shoulder kinetics and kinematics during functional movements between young adults, healthy elderly and elderly with subacromial pain syndrome. - Shoulder function of healthy adults and SAPS patients.

niversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen0 sites30 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsSchouderklachtenSubacromial shoulder disorders

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Schouderklachten
Sponsor
niversitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Enrollment
30
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Observational non invasive

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •For the healthy subjects:
  • •Men and women, aged between 20\-30 years or above 55 years
  • •Being able to read/understand Dutch
  • •Being able to give an informed consent;For the SAPS patients.
  • •Men and women, aged above 55 years
  • •Being able to read/understand Dutch
  • •Being able to give an informed consent
  • •Pain free shoulder for the past 6 months prior to the current episode, without earlier surgery.
  • •Pain upon abduction of the shoulder with painful arch
  • •Chronic (longer than 3 months)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •For the healthy subjects
  • •Upper extremity pathologies that could interfere with the measurement results
  • •Presence of specific rheumatic diseases, dementia or other psychiatric disorders.
  • •History of severe trauma of the shoulder within the previous two years (e.g. fracture, luxation);For the SAPS patients
  • •Presence of frozen shoulder,
  • •Other upper extremity pathologies that could interfere with the measurement results
  • •Incapable of abducting or elevating (anteflexion) the affected arm \> 30 degrees
  • •Previous surgery of the affected shoulder
  • •Presence of dementia or other psychiatric disorders, specific rheumatic diseases or a full thickness rotator cuff rupture
  • •History of severe trauma of the shoulder within the previous two years (e.g. fracture, luxation)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Withdrawn
Phase 4
Relation among shoulder kinematics and kinetics during thoracohumeral elevations, performance of standardized ADL tasks, rehabilitation exercises, and clinical outcome measures in patients with a primary placed total shoulder prosthesismotion analysis total shoulder10023213
NL-OMON34199Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis20
Recruiting
Not Applicable
comparison of strength, ROM, work performance between workers with and without shoulder impingment syndromeDiseases of the musculo-skeletal system and connective tissue
KCT0002678Yonsei University60
Recruiting
Phase 1
A Comparative Study of Range of Motion of Shoulder between Ultrasound Guided Hydrodilatation with Corticosteroid and Conventional Corticosteroid Injection alone in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized, Controlled and Double-blinded Studyadhesive capsulitis patient with not improve by physical therapyadhesive capsulitisultrasoundhydrodilatation
TCTR20210217005/A52
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHOULDER MOVEMENTS AND NECK PAIN AND FUNCTION AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS WITH MECHANICAL NECK PAI
CTRI/2021/11/037943Anamika Arjun
Recruiting
Not Applicable
The effect of electromyographic biofeedback on the electromyographic activity of the shoulder girdle muscles in primary impingement syndrome
IRCT20240313061278N1Semnan University of Medical Sciences45