Comparison Between Handheld Rebound Tonometer and Applanation Tonometer in IOP Measurement in Paediatric Glaucomas
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- Glaucoma
- Registration Number
- NCT06766799
- Lead Sponsor
- Sohag University
- Brief Summary
To compare the accuracy between handheld rebound tonometer \& applanation tonometer in IOP measurement in pediatric glaucoma cases
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 160
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients attending to our pediatric glaucoma clinic diagnosed with glaucoma aged >18 years old are subjected to IOP Measurements.
Exclusion Criteria
-
**Patients aged more than 18 years old
- patients with scarred cornea
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison between the IOP Measurments by Rebound Tonometer & Applanation tonometer over nine months To compare the accuracy between handheld rebound tonometer \& applanation tonometer in IOP measurement in pediatric glaucoma cases
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
How does corneal hysteresis affect IOP measurement accuracy in pediatric glaucoma using rebound vs. applanation tonometry?
What are the comparative advantages of handheld rebound tonometry over Goldmann applanation in congenital glaucoma cases?
Which biomarkers correlate with IOP variability in pediatric patients using rebound or applanation tonometers?
What adverse events are associated with repeated applanation tonometry in young glaucoma patients?
How do rebound tonometers compare to dynamic contour tonometry in secondary pediatric glaucoma management?