Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprotheses. The 'LYTEN' Trial
- Conditions
- Regurgitation, AorticProsthesis FailureAortic Valve Stenosis
- Interventions
- Procedure: TAVI_ViV procedure with CoreValve systemProcedure: TAVI_ViV procedure with Edwards valve
- Registration Number
- NCT03520101
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec
- Brief Summary
The treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) of patients with small (≤23mm) surgical bioprostheses remains a challenge due to the increased transvalvular residual gradients and high rates of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) following the procedure.
- Detailed Description
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized open-label trial including patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction in the presence of a small (≤23mm; inner diameter ≤21 mm) stented surgical valve. Following the Heart Team'S decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will be randomized to either receive an Edwards (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) valve or a CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO system. New iterations of these valve models may also be included.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
- Patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction defined as severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation approved for a ViV procedure by the Heart Team
- Stented surgical valves.
- Small (≤23mm) surgical valve
- Stentless or sutureless surgical valves
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description COREVALVE TAVI_ViV procedure with CoreValve system Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will received the CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO valve system. SAPIEN TAVI_ViV procedure with Edwards valve Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will received an Edwards (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) valve.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Residual transvalvular gradient 30 days Residual (maximal and mean) transvalvular gradient.
Rate of prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (valve performance) 30 days Severe prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (defined as an index aortic valve area ≤0.65 cm2/m2) and/or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (VARC-2 definition).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in LV hypertrophy 30 days and 1 year Changes in LV hypertrophy
Transvalvular gradient. 1-year Maximal and mean transvalvular gradient
Valve performance : Moderate or severe PPM moderate-severe AR at 30 days and 1 year. 30 days and 1 year Moderate or severe PPM; moderate-severe AR.
Clinical safety endpoints 30 days and 1 year individually and combined: death, stroke, major or life threatening bleeding, pacemaker implantation, myocardial infarction.
Exercise capacity 30 days and 1 year Exercise capacity as evaluated by the six-minute walk test
Combined endpoints: Moderate-severe AR or severe PPM at 1-year follow-up. 1 year Moderate-severe AR or severe PPM.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
IUCPQ
🇨🇦Quebec, Canada