Hydrocortisone Replacement in Patients With Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency (SUPREME CORT)
- Registration Number
- NCT01546922
- Lead Sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate whether a physiologically low hydrocortisone (HC) dose is better for cognition as compared to a physiologically high HC dose. In addition, quality of life, metabolic profile and somatosensation will be described in relation to HC dose.
- Detailed Description
* Rationale: A wide variety in hydrocortisone (HC) substitution dose-regimens are considered physiological for patients with adrenal insufficiency. However, it is likely that cognition is negatively influenced by higher cortisol exposure to the brain. No studies have been performed to assess the effects of treatment regimens with a low physiological HC substitution dose on cognition in comparison to a high physiological HC substitution dose. These treatment regimens should take body weight and multiple dosing into account. In addition, substitution doses should be monitored by clinical evaluation and biochemical analysis for adverse effects associated with over- or under-replacement.
* Intervention: Patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency will be randomized in two groups to receive either a low dose HC (0.2-0.3 mg/kg body weight) for 10 weeks followed by 10 weeks of high dose HC (0.4-0.6 mg/kg body weight) or vice versa. At baseline and after both treatment periods, patients will be tested.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 63
- Patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency.
- Age ≥ 18 - 75 years
- ≥ One year after tumor treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy
- On stable concomitant medications for at least six months prior to entry of study
- Body weight 50-100 kg
- Inability of legal consent
- Documented cognitive impairment
- Drug abuse/dependence
- History of / current psychiatric disorders
- Use of anti-epileptics (e.g. carbamezapine)
- Cushing Disease
- Type 1 diabetes or Type 2 diabetes with medication known to induce hypoglycemia (f.e. Sulfonylurea derivatives
- Current treatment for second malignancy
- Have a significant medical condition (e.g. hepatic, respiratory, or cardiovascular) which, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the interpretation of results and safety or efficacy evaluations.
- A history of frequent hypocortisolism
- Hospitalization during study
- Work in shifts
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description First low dose HC followed by high dose HC Hydrocortisone First low dose of hydrocortisone = 0.2-0.3 mg/kg body weight for 10 weeks followed by a high dose of hydrocortisone = 0.4-0.6 mg/kg body weight First high dose HC followed by low dose HC Hydrocortisone First a high dose of hydrocortisone = 0.4-0.6 mg/kg body weight for 10 weeks followed by a low dose of hydrocortisone = 0.2-0.3 mg/kg body weight
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Cognition After 10 Weeks of Treatment With a Low Dose of Hydrocortisone Compared to 10 Weeks of Treatment With a High Dose of Hydrocortisone. After completion of treatment period 1 (that is after 10 weeks from baseline) and after treatment period 2 (that is after 20 weeks from baseline). Cognitive domains to be tested: memory, executive functioning, attention and social cognition.
The psychological tests consist of oral and written questions or computer tasks.
Data is given as Z-scores based on normative data. Higher Z-scores represent a better performance.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Quality of Life After 10 Weeks of Treatment With a Low Dose of Hydrocortisone Compared to 10 Weeks of Treatment With a High Dose of Hydrocortisone. After completion of treatment period 1 (that is after 10 weeks from baseline) and after treatment period 2 (that is after 20 weeks from baseline). Quality of life questionnaires have to be filled in by the participant at his/her home place and have to be returned by post.
Change in Metabolic Profile After 10 Weeks of Treatment With a Low Dose of Hydrocortisone Compared to 10 Weeks of Treatment With a High Dose of Hydrocortisone. After completion of treatment period 1 (that is after 10 weeks from baseline) and after treatment period 2 (that is after 20 weeks from baseline). Cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, (pituitary) hormones and bone markers.
Change in Somatosensation After 10 Weeks of Treatment With a Low Dose of Hydrocortisone Compared to 10 Weeks of Treatment With a High Dose of Hydrocortisone. After completion of treatment period 1 (that is after 10 weeks from baseline) and after treatment period 2 (that is after 20 weeks from baseline). Measures of somatosensation: the mechanical detection threshold, the mechanical pain threshold, mechanical pain sensitivity, dynamic mechanical allodynia, wind up ratio and the pressure pain threshold.
Change in Perceived Common Somatic Complaints After 10 Weeks of Treatment With a Low Dose of Hydrocortisone Compared to 10 Weeks of Treatment With a High Dose of Hydrocortisone. during treatment period 1 (that is from week 1 to week 10 from baseline) and during treatment period 2 (that is from week 11 to week 20 from baseline). The patients report common somatic complaints by filling in structured daily diaries.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Medical Centre Groningen
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands