A comparative study on the effects of proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Conventional physiotherapy treatment on upper limb and gait function in stroke subjects.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: G819- Hemiplegia, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/05/052930
- Lead Sponsor
- Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patient with hemiplegic subacute stroke between 3-6 months, both male and female aged from 50-70 years
2. Patients with more than 24 in Mini-mental state examination
3. Patients with spasticity between grades (+1 and 1) on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
4. Patients with Brunnstrom Voluntary control grading more than or equal to 4
5. Patients who were independent in ambulation with or without a walking aid
Exclusion Criteria
1. patients who have uncontrolled hypertension, symptomatic heart failure, or unstable angina.
2. patients who have a recurrent stroke.
3. patients who have any traumatic upper and lower limb musculoskeletal conditions.
4. patients who had organ damage such as lung, heart, kidney, or liver failure.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Palpation Meter (PALM) <br/ ><br>2.Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) <br/ ><br>3.10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after <br/ ><br>6 weeks. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Handheld Dynamometer <br/ ><br>2. Dynamic gait index (DGI) <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after <br/ ><br>6 weeks.