Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCardiac Arrest
- Interventions
- Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression SystemOther: Manuel chest compressions by human efforts
- Registration Number
- NCT04069377
- Lead Sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
- Detailed Description
In this study, the investigators retrospectively analyzed resuscitations performed over a 2-year period and compared manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge parameters.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 214
Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases Out-of-hospital arrest
<18 age
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mechanical chest compression LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System In the study, chest compression in the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was performed with the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Chest Compression System (LUCAS 2). Manuel chest compression Manuel chest compressions by human efforts Manuel chest compressions will be handled by human efforts.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of the mortality on the 30th day 30 days Mortality from the admission to the 30th day
Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation 5 minutes Return of spontaneous circulation at least 5 minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine
🇹🇷Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey