Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Completed

• Conditions: Resuscitation; Cardiac Arrest

• Registration Number: NCT04422938
• Lead Sponsor: Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Detailed Description

In this study, the investigators analyzed cardiopulmonary resuscitations performed over a 2-year period in an emergency department of a training and research hospital and compared success of manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge. Investigators present the study as an in-hospital cardiac arrest study; however, all of the resuscitation performed in the cases included in the study were performed in the emergency department.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2016-01-01
• Primary Completion: 2017-12-31
• Study Completion: 2018-03-31
• Status Verified: 2020-06
• Study First Submitted: 2020-06-05
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-06-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-06-05
• Study First Posted: 2020-06-09
• Last Update Posted: 2020-06-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 303

Inclusion Criteria

Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department

Exclusion Criteria

<18 age

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mortality rate on the 30th day	30 days	Mortality rates from the hospital admission to the 30th day
Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation	5 minutes	Rate of return of the spontaneous circulation with duration at least five minutes

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine; 🇹🇷 Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey