MedPath

Single-rescuer Pediatric Resuscitation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chest Compression
Interventions
Other: Manually chest compressions
Device: Cardiopump
Device: LifeLine ARM
Registration Number
NCT02694900
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
Brief Summary

The objective of this pilot study was to compare the manual chest compressions (CC) versus CC feedback device TrueCPR vs mechanical CC device LifeLine ARM during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • maximum 1 year of work experience in medicine
  • minimum 10 clinical resuscitations
  • paramedics, nurses, physicians
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases
  • pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Resuscitation on the stretcherCardiopump2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on a stretcher
Resuscitation on the florCardiopump2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on the floor
Resuscitation on the florLifeLine ARM2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on the floor
Resuscitation on the stretcherManually chest compressions2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on a stretcher
Resuscitation on the florManually chest compressions2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on the floor
Resuscitation on the stretcherLifeLine ARM2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on a stretcher
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
chest compressions effectiveness1 day

the percentage of correct chest compressions relative to the total number of chest compressions

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Depth1 day

correct depth according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Ease-of-use1 day

To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each chest compression method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

Pressure point1 day

correct pressure point according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Rate of chest compressions1 day

correct chest compressions rate according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Complete pressure release1 day

Complete pressure release measure by manikin software

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Łukasz Szarpak

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath