MedPath

Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression

Completed
Conditions
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Cardiac Arrest
Interventions
Device: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System
Other: Manuel chest compressions by human efforts
Registration Number
NCT04069377
Lead Sponsor
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases.

Detailed Description

In this study, the investigators retrospectively analyzed resuscitations performed over a 2-year period and compared manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge parameters.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
214
Inclusion Criteria

Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases Out-of-hospital arrest

Exclusion Criteria

<18 age

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Mechanical chest compressionLUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression SystemIn the study, chest compression in the mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation group was performed with the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Chest Compression System (LUCAS 2).
Manuel chest compressionManuel chest compressions by human effortsManuel chest compressions will be handled by human efforts.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of the mortality on the 30th day30 days

Mortality from the admission to the 30th day

Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation5 minutes

Return of spontaneous circulation at least 5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine

🇹🇷

Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath