Mechanical Versus Manual Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Conditions
- ResuscitationCardiac Arrest
- Interventions
- Other: Manuel chest compressions handled by cliniciansDevice: LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System
- Registration Number
- NCT04422938
- Lead Sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators compared mechanical and manual chest compressions in in-hospital cardiac arrest cases.
- Detailed Description
In this study, the investigators analyzed cardiopulmonary resuscitations performed over a 2-year period in an emergency department of a training and research hospital and compared success of manual and mechanical chest compressions in terms of return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, and hospital discharge. Investigators present the study as an in-hospital cardiac arrest study; however, all of the resuscitation performed in the cases included in the study were performed in the emergency department.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 303
Over 18 age Cardiac arrest cases In-hospital cardiac arrest cases Resuscitations performed in emergency department
<18 age
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Manuel compression Manuel chest compressions handled by clinicians Manuel chest compressions will be handled by clinicians Mechanical compression LUCAS™ 2 Chest Compression System Mechanical chest compressions will be handled via mechanical chest compression device
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mortality rate on the 30th day 30 days Mortality rates from the hospital admission to the 30th day
Rate of the return of spontaneous circulation 5 minutes Rate of return of the spontaneous circulation with duration at least five minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine
🇹🇷Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey