Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/ISRCTN57474502
ISRCTN57474502Completed未知

Comparative effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in women with breast cancer

Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)0 sites1,623 target enrollmentStarted: June 19, 2002Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
未知
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
1,623
Study OverviewEligibility CriteriaInvestigatorsRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

2010 Results article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20025837 results on cost effectiveness 2010 Results article in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159292 results on clinical effectiveness

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
Female

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients scheduled for wide local excision for primary breast cancer

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Added as of 10/06/2008:
  • •1. Medically unstable
  • •2. Known contraindication to magnetic resonance (MR) scanning
  • •3. Known to have had an allergic reaction associated with previous administration of paramagnetic contrast agent or have a severe allergic diathesis
  • •4. Require renal dialysis
  • •5. Have undergone chemotherapy/ hormonal therapy for cancer of the contralateral breast (or other sites) in the previous 12 months or have chemotherapy planned to any site before their breast surgery
  • •6. Have had surgery or radiotherapy for cancer to the ipsilateral breast
  • •7. Have had surgery to the ipsilateral breast within the previous 4 months for benign breast disease
  • •8. Have a history of serious breast trauma within the last 3 months
  • •9. Pregnant or breast feeding
  • •10. Disability preventing MR scanning in the prone position
  • •11. Under the care of a breast surgeon recruiting into the ALMANAC Trial

Investigators

Sponsor
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

Similar Trials

Terminated
Phase 3
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Approach to Patients With Suspected Biliary ObstructionSuspected Biliary Obstruction
NCT01424657McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre378
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of MRI to select men who need prostate biopsy
KCT0005219Seoul National University Hospital234
Unknown
Not Applicable
Diagnostic Accuracy of MR in MyositisMuscular Disorders, AtrophicMyositis
NCT01702870University of Warwick70
Completed
Not Applicable
The cost-effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for investigation of the knee jointMusculoskeletal injuryMusculoskeletal DiseasesKnee injury
ISRCTN17898966Department of Health (UK)118
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparative study of magnetic resonance defaecography and evacuation proctography in evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunctioPelvic floor dysfunction/obstructive defecationDigestive SystemOther specified functional intestinal disorders
ISRCTN73466412Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (UK)57