MedPath

Safety and Efficacy of OMS302 in Subjects Undergoing Intraocular Lens Replacement With Phacoemulsification

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Intraocular Lens Replacement
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT01454063
Lead Sponsor
Omeros Corporation
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of OMS302 (the study drug) for maintaining intraoperative mydriasis in individuals undergoing Intraocular Lens Replacement (ILR) surgery.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
405
Inclusion Criteria
  • Competent and willing to voluntarily provide informed consent
  • 18 years of age or older
  • In good general health needing to undergo cataract extraction or lens extraction with lens replacement surgery in one eye, under topical anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
  • No allergies to the medications and/or the active ingredients of any of the study medications
  • No medications with the same activities of the active ingredients in OMS302 for defined time intervals prior to and after surgery
  • No other significant eye injuries, eye conditions or general medical conditions likely to interfere with the evaluation of the study medication

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
OMS302OMS302OMS302 diluted in Balanced Salt Solution and administered as irrigation solution during Intraocular Lens Replacement surgery.
PlaceboPlaceboPlacebo diluted in Balanced Salt Solution and administered as irrigation solution during Intraocular Lens Replacement surgery.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Area-under-the-Curve (AUC) Analysis of Change From Baseline in Pupil Diameter (mm) During Surgeryfrom surgery baseline (pre-incision) through surgery end (time of cortical clean-up/wound closure)

Change in pupil diameter over time from surgical baseline (immediately prior to surgical incision) to the end of the surgical procedure (wound closure) was summarized using descriptive statistics by treatment arm and time-point (every minute).

The primary analysis of the change in pupil diameter was based on the mean area-under-the-curve (AUC) pupil diameter change from baseline. First, the AUC of the pupil diameter from surgical baseline to wound closure was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Second, the mean AUC was obtained by dividing the AUC by the total time of surgery. Third, the mean AUC of change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline pupil diameter from the mean AUC.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Area-under-the-Curve Analysis of Ocular Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score Within 12 Hours Postoperatively12 hours

The primary analysis of the ocular pain VAS (where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain) was based on the mean area-under-the-curve (AUC). The AUC of the ocular pain VAS during 12 hours postoperatively was calculated by the trapezoidal rule in which the hour 11 was used to represent the time-point 10-12 hours. The mean AUC was defined as the AUC divided by the number of hours with ocular pain VAS results during the first 12 hours postoperatively.

Photophobia at 6 Hours After Surgery (Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale [Numerical Rating System - NRS] Scores)Six hours postoperatively

Photophobia outcomes based on Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale (Numerical Rating System - NRS) at 6 hours postoperatively.

Photophobia at Day 1 After Surgery (Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale [Numerical Rating System - NRS] Scores)One day

Photophobia outcomes based on Ocular Pain and Symptoms Numerical Ordinal Scale (Numerical Rating System - NRS) at Day 1 postoperatively

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BVCA) Log Score on Day 1One day

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) summarized by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity log score. For subjects without a score due to inability to read the ETDRS chart, the log score was imputed as 1.6 for the purpose of treatment comparisons. Subjects without a score because the manifest refraction was not completed were excluded from the analysis.

Ocular Inflammation in Summed Ocular Inflammation Score (SOIS) Grade on Day 1One day

The mean SOIS summarized by treatment arm and time point on Day 1 postoperatively. Ocular inflammation was evaluated by measuring the anterior chamber cell count and flare using a slit lamp biomicroscope. SOIS was calculated by adding the average of subject's anterior chamber cells and flare grades. The minimum SOIS was 0 (indicating absence of inflammation), whereas the maximum SOIS was 8.

Grading was as follows:

Anterior Chamber Cells: Grade None = 0/no cells; Grade Mild = +1/1-5 cells; Grade Moderate = +2/6-15 cells; Grade Severe = +3/16-30 cells; Grade Very Severe = +4/\>30 cells.

Anterior Chamber Flare: Grade None = 0/no Tyndall effect; Grade Mild = +1/barely discernable Tyndall effect; Grade Moderate = +2/moderately intense Tyndall beam in anterior chamber; Grade Severe = +3/severely intense Tyndall beam; Grade Very Severe = +4/very severely intense Tyndall beam with a white and milky appearance to the aqueous

Ocular Pain VAS Score After Day of Surgery - Day 1One day

Pain VAS scores (where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain) after the day of surgery summarized by treatment arm and time-point.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath