Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01546675
NCT01546675
Completed
N/A

Interface Kinematics of Transhumeral Prosthetic Sockets Using XROMM

US Department of Veterans Affairs2 sites in 1 country2 target enrollmentJanuary 2012

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Traumatic Amputation of Arm
Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Enrollment
2
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Degrees of Shoulder Abduction Within the Prosthetic Socket
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this pilot study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of two designs for transhumeral level upper limb prosthetic sockets: a traditional socket design and a socket design hypothesized to provide greater skeletal stabilization. The investigators comparisons included assessments of patient comfort and satisfaction with fit, as well as dynamic kinematic assessment using X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) a novel high-speed, high-resolution, bi-plane video radiography system.

Detailed Description

In the past decade, advances in upper limb socket design and technology have been proposed to increase comfort and decrease perceived weight of the prosthesis. There have been no scientific studies to date that have evaluated the benefits of these designs, and thus no evidence to support use of one type of prosthetic socket design over another. Thus, the overall purpose of this pilot study was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of two designs for transhumeral level upper limb prosthetic sockets: a traditional socket design and a socket design hypothesized to provide greater skeletal stabilization.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2012
End Date
September 2013
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male and female transhumeral amputees, 18 years or older of any ethnicity, who are current prosthetic users.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with frozen shoulder of the residual side, and/or severely limited active range of motion of the shoulder joint of the residual limb
  • Inability to tolerate wearing of a prosthetic socket
  • Mental impairment that renders a subject unable to comply with the study
  • Skin conditions such as burns or poor skin coverage as well as those with severe contractures that prevent prior prosthetic wear
  • Any electrically controlled medical device including pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or drug pumps
  • Neuropathy, uncontrolled diabetes, receiving dialysis
  • Any other significant comorbidity which would interfere with the study
  • Severe circulatory problems including peripheral vascular disease and pitting edema will be excluded
  • Cognitive deficits or mental health problems that would limit ability to participate fully in the study protocol
  • Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant in the near future

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Degrees of Shoulder Abduction Within the Prosthetic Socket

Time Frame: After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style)

Shoulder abduction was performed to the subject's maximum elevation. Skeletal and socket kinematics were calculated using the markerless auto-registration algorithm and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM)

Degrees of Shoulder Internal Rotation Within the Prosthetic Socket

Time Frame: After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style)

Isometric internal rotation was performed with the prosthetic elbow flexed to 90 degrees and shoulder in neutral position. Skeletal and socket kinematics were calculated using the markerless auto-registration algorithm and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM)

Degrees of Shoulder Displacement Within the Prosthetic Socket

Time Frame: After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style)

A shoulder shrug task was achieved by pulling up on a strap attached to the load cell, which was mounted on the vertical face of the concrete pedestal. Skeletal and socket kinematics were calculated using the markerless auto-registration algorithm and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) - Utility Subscale(after 2 weeks of home use of each socket type)
  • Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) - Residual Limb Health Subscale(After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style))
  • Trinity Amputations and Prosthetics Experience Satisfaction Scale (TAPES)(After 4 weeks of home use (2 weeks for each socket style))

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials