Effectiveness of a Brief Psychological Mindfulness Based Intervention for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care: Face-to-face Application, Treatment as Usual and Application Through ICTs
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder
- Sponsor
- Universitat Jaume I
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Beck Depression Inventory-II
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess and compare a mindfulness low-intensity (4 weeks) psychological intervention for the treatment of depression in Primary Care between different groups: a mindfulness intervention applied face to face in group format, a control group that will receive treatment as usual (TAU) consisting of medical treatment and the same mindfulness intervention applied by Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). The principal hypothesis is that face to face intervention will be more effective than TAU
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to assess and compare a mindfulness low-intensity (4 weeks) psychological intervention for the treatment of depression in Primary Care between different groups: 1) a face-to-face mindfulness intervention in group format (10-12 people/group), 2) a control group which will received primary care TAU (usual medical treatment) and 3) the same mindfulness intervention applied by Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) (Internet-based program). All participants in the two psychological intervention groups will also receive usual medical treatment managed by their general practitioner. Each group will be composed of 40 participants with a total sample of 120. The principal hypothesis is that face to face intervention will be more effective than TAU. Secondary hypothesis, are: 1) The online computerized program will be more effective than TAU; 2) The differences between face-to-face and online format will be analyzed. Finally, a qualitative study will be conducted in order to analyze the feasibility, acceptance, barriers and causes of drop-outs and success, expectations, experiences and attitudes that could be obstacles or facilitators in the interventions, both in patients and in health professionals. This study will allow us to understand the experiences of depressed patients with these interventions and their differences.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Willingness to participate in the study and signing informed consent
- •Ability to understand and write Spanish.
- •DSM-5 diagnose of Major Depression or Dysthymia, mild or moderate depression expressed as score lower than 14 in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
- •Duration of depressive symptoms 2 months or more
- •To have and to handle the computer and internet
Exclusion Criteria
- •Any diagnose of disease that may affect central nervous system (brain pathology, traumatic brain injury, dementia, etc.),
- •Other psychiatric diagnoses or acute psychiatric illness (substance dependence or abuse, history of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, eating disorders, etc.), except for anxious pathology or personality disorders
- •Any medical, infectious or degenerative disease that may affect mood, presence of delusional ideas or hallucinations consistent or not with mood, and suicide risk
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Beck Depression Inventory-II
Time Frame: Twelve-months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes
- Health Survey 12 (SF-12)(Twelve-months follow-up)
- EuroQol (EQ-5D). Health related quality of life(Twelve-months follow-up)
- Five Facets and factors of mindfulness (FFMQ)(Twelve-months follow-up)
- Positive and negative affect (PANAS)(Twelve-months follow-up)
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9(twelve-months follow-up)
- Sociodemographic data Gender, age, marital status, education, occupation, economical level(Baseline)
- Pemberton Happiness Index (PHI)(Twelve-months follow-up)