Functional Jejunal Interposition Improve Nutritional Status After Total Gastrectomy
- Conditions
- Gastric CancerNutrition Disorders
- Registration Number
- NCT01996059
- Lead Sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the nutritional status of patients undergoing Functional Jejunal Interposition is better than those with Roux-en-Y After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. To find a better reconstruction for patients who received total gastrectomy.
- Detailed Description
Surgery is the only curative way for gastric cancer to date. Methods of Resection and reconstruction are closely related to prognosis and nutritional status. Therefore, it is essential to choose. At present, more and more clinical centers tend to choose Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after total gastrectomy, which are prone to a variety of complications, and seriously affects the quality of life, such as malnutrition. There is argument over whether functional jejunal interposition is better than those with Roux-en-Y After total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. How to improve the nutritional status of the patients following total gastrectomy with gastrointestinal reconstruction arouses people's attention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences of the nutritional status in patients undergoing functional jejunal interposition and Roux-en-Y after total gastrectomy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 500
- Untreated patients with curative resectable gastric cancer (A)a clear pathological diagnosis (B)the surgeon and radiologist assess the possibility of removal (C)no previous history of other malignancies. (D)the patient has signed an informed consent form (E)cardiopulmonary and kidney function is normal (F)ECOG body condition scores 0 to 1 (G)does not require emergency surgery
- (A) pregnant or lactating women; (B) of the liver, lung, bone, and other distant metastasis; (C) positive supraclavicular lymph nodes, pelvic or ovarian species, peritoneal dissemination, etc.; (D) massive ascites, cachexia; (E) with other serious diseases, including cardiovascular, respiratory, kidney, or liver disease, poor merger control hypertension, diabetes; (F) mental disorder or disease; (G) 4 weeks prior to enrollment participated or are participating in other clinical trials of patients; (H) had undergone surgery, and its influence has not been eliminated for patients; (I) a history of stomach or esophagus cancer, including stromal tumors, sarcoma, lymphoma, carcinoid; (J) combined with active infection in patients (infection caused by fever above 38 ℃); (K) in patients with poor compliance or poor patient compliance investigators to consider; (L) Some researchers believe that other clinical, laboratory conditions patients should not participate in the trial.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Body Mass Index 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Onodera Prognosis Nutritional Index 3 months
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
the 6th Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
🇨🇳Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
the 6th Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University🇨🇳Guangzhou, Guangdong, ChinaXiaobin Woo, M.D.Contact+86 20 38254092xiaobinwoo@gmail.comHuixing Luo, M.D.Contact+86 20 38254092huixingluo@fox.mailJunsheng Peng, M.D.Principal Investigator