Assessment of Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk After CRT-D Replacement for Patients With Primary Prevention Indication
- Conditions
- Cardiac ResynchronizationCardioverter-Defibrillators, ImplantableDevice ReplacementBiventricular Pacemakers, Artificial
- Registration Number
- NCT02323503
- Lead Sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Brief Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce heart failure (HF), hospitalizations and death in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35% and wide QRS. CRT provides electromechanical resynchronization and improves LV systolic function. The induced LV reverse remodeling or near normalization in LVEF to ≥45% is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA). And at the time of replacement, the need for defibrillator back-up after an event-free first CRT-D service-life for patients with improved LVEF is a controversy question.
80% of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) patients implanted for primary prevention do not experience VTA during the life-time of their first device.
So, regarding patients implanted with a CRT-D for primary prevention at the time of first implantation, the question is will they experience VTA after their device replacement by another CRT-D.
- Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to describe, in a population of patients who had a primary prevention ICD indication at first implantation of a CRT-D, the relevance defibrillator back-up after the replacement of the first CRT-D. For that, the rate of patients with at least one sustained VTA detected by the CRT-D or a conventional surface ECG will be assessed after the device replacement.
Furthermore, the association between the baseline characteristics of the CRT-D population after replacement and the risk of subsequent VTA will be explored after a minimum of two years FU.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 289
- Patient with primary prevention indication for defibrillation at the time of the first CRT-D implantation
- Patient implanted as first replacement by a CRT-D device (CRT-D by CRT-D)
- Lifetime of the previous CRT-D > 3 years
- Patient willing and able to comply with the protocol and who has provided written informed consent
- Patient whose medical situation is stable.
- Patient with an ICD lead under advisory (e.g. Fidelis lead)
- Right or left ventricular leads exchange during CRT-D replacement
- Non functional atrial (except for patient with chronic AF) or right/left ventricular leads
- Life expectancy < 1 year
- Age < 18 years
- Pregnant woman or woman who plan to become pregnant during the trial
- Participation in another interventional clinical study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assess the rate of patients with at least one sustained VTA after replacement up to two years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of patients with at least one VTA for 4 specific subgroups After the device replacement and after a minimum of two years follow-up (FU) Grp R\[1-4\]: LVEF ≥40% / \<40% at the time of replacement and with / without previous VTA during the lifetime of their first CRT-D device
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (37)
OLV Aalst
🇧🇪Aalst, Belgium
CH d'Annecy
🇫🇷Annecy, France
Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
🇫🇷Brest, France
CHU Caen
🇫🇷Caen, France
CHU Montpied
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France
CH Du Bocage
🇫🇷Dijon, France
CHRU de Lille
🇫🇷Lille, France
CHU de Limoges
🇫🇷Limoges, France
CH Saint Philibert
🇫🇷Lomme, France
Cliniques du Tonkin, de la Sauvegarde et Protestante
🇫🇷Lyon, France
Scroll for more (27 remaining)OLV Aalst🇧🇪Aalst, Belgium