MedPath

Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Quality of Life
Registration Number
NCT06107855
Lead Sponsor
Northumbria University
Brief Summary

The aims of this study were to:

1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.

2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • Participants were eligible if they were between 30-60 years old
  • Uninjured
  • Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
  • Had not participated in lower-limb RT in the previous six months.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Participants were excluded if they had either taken part in any lower-limb RT in the last six months
  • Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in RT
  • Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended PA guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense PA per week.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality-of-lifeThe time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Participant quality of life (focus group questions \& SF-36)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Strength (1RM)The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Participants one-repetition max on leg press

Timed-up-and-go (TUG)The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Standing from a chair, walking to a point 3 metres away, turn, and return to the chair as quick as possible whilst walking.

30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS)The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Maximal amount of repetitions a participant can stand up from a chair in 30-seconds.

BMIThe time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Additional measures calculated from participants test results

BalanceThe time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Using the biodex SD to do a 3 x 20s double-foot eyes-open balance test on Level 6.

6-minute Walk Test (6MWT)The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

a "brisk"-paced 6-minute walk test.

Strength-to-massThe time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.

Additional measures calculated from participants test results

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Nortuhmbria University

🇬🇧

Newcastle, Tyne And Wear, United Kingdom

Nortuhmbria University
🇬🇧Newcastle, Tyne And Wear, United Kingdom

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.