Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults
- Conditions
- Quality of Life
- Registration Number
- NCT06107855
- Lead Sponsor
- Northumbria University
- Brief Summary
The aims of this study were to:
1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.
2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Participants were eligible if they were between 30-60 years old
- Uninjured
- Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
- Had not participated in lower-limb RT in the previous six months.
- Participants were excluded if they had either taken part in any lower-limb RT in the last six months
- Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in RT
- Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended PA guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense PA per week.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality-of-life The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Participant quality of life (focus group questions \& SF-36)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Strength (1RM) The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Participants one-repetition max on leg press
Timed-up-and-go (TUG) The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Standing from a chair, walking to a point 3 metres away, turn, and return to the chair as quick as possible whilst walking.
30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS) The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Maximal amount of repetitions a participant can stand up from a chair in 30-seconds.
BMI The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Additional measures calculated from participants test results
Balance The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Using the biodex SD to do a 3 x 20s double-foot eyes-open balance test on Level 6.
6-minute Walk Test (6MWT) The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. a "brisk"-paced 6-minute walk test.
Strength-to-mass The time frame for my testing intervals will be conducted at specific time points: at baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 9, out of a total study duration of 9 weeks. Additional measures calculated from participants test results
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Nortuhmbria University
🇬🇧Newcastle, Tyne And Wear, United Kingdom
Nortuhmbria University🇬🇧Newcastle, Tyne And Wear, United Kingdom