Anovaginal Distance, Interobserver Agreement
- Conditions
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
- Interventions
- Other: anovaginal distance variation
- Registration Number
- NCT02943018
- Lead Sponsor
- Ostergotland County Council, Sweden
- Brief Summary
Interobserver variation in measuring the anovaginal distance (AVD) with perineal ultrasound
- Detailed Description
Aims: This study describes perineal ultrasound measurement of the AVD in regard to ease of learning and interobserver agreement, in order to establish if the method is reliable to use in further research about objective postpartum description of perineal tears.
Methods: To educate the examiners, the method was shown and described by an experienced examiner. The examiners then measured the anovaginal distance in one woman repeatedly with until similar results (+/- 5 mm ) were achieved. The woman was in the lithotomy position and a vaginal ultrasound probe was used. The AVD in another 40 women was then measured and documented by two examiners, right after the other, who were blinded to the other´s results. The distance was measured between the mucosal margin of the internal anal sphincter and the vaginal probe. Interobserver agreement was calculated using Kappa-score.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Examiners; the gynecologists authoring the study
Patients:
- any women visiting the gynaecological outpatient clinic of Linköping University Hospital where a vaginal ultrasound examination was performed
Examiners: n/a
Patients:
- inability to understand spoken or written Swedish
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description anovaginal distance variation anovaginal distance variation 3 measurements
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method interobserver variation in measurements of the anovaginal distance with perineal ultrasound immediate 3 measurements per investigator and patient, comparing variation, using kappa value
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ease of learning the technique of perineal ultrasound to measure the anovaginal distance immediate how many measurements did the investigator learning the procedure need to perform produce a measurement that was within 5 mm of the measurements of the teacher