Effect of Ivabradine on Exercise Capacity After Heart Transplantation
- Conditions
- Transplanted Heart ComplicationCardiac Allograft Vasculopathy
- Interventions
- Drug: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT03405831
- Lead Sponsor
- Finn Gustafsson
- Brief Summary
This study evaluates whether treatment with ivabradine compared to placebo can improve exercise capacity in long-term heart transplant recipients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy and elevated heart rate at rest.
Patients will receive treatment with either ivabradin or placebo for a period of 12 weeks.
- Detailed Description
Elevated resting heart rate (HR) is a normal finding after successful heart transplantation (HTx) due to parasympathetic denervation at the operation.
Elevated resting HR is generally acknowledged as a negative predictor of outcome in heart disease. The impact in heart transplant recipients is not fully understood, however, it has been associated with increased risk of developing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) or death.
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a diffuse vascular disease affecting the entire coronary tree. It is the leading cause of death in patients more than 5 years after HTx and it is well known that patients with CAV have markedly reduced exercise capacity.
The association between elevated HR and CAV raises the question whether an intervention to specifically lower HR could improve symptoms and prognosis in heart transplant recipients with CAV and elevated resting HR.
Small studies have shown that HR reduction using the If channel blocker ivabradine after HTx is safe. However, none of these studies were randomized or blinded, and as such proof of any efficacy (beyond HR reduction) after HTx is non-existing. Clearly, there is a need to determine if such treatment could improve exercise capacity, graft function and prognosis after HTx.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 35
- Patients > 1 year post heart transplantation
- CAV verified by coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound
- Resting HR > 80 bpm
- Age > 18 years
- Signed informed consent
Women, who have not yet entered menopause (defined as no menstrual bleeding in the last 12 months), will be required to provide a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) before entering the study and must use a safe birth control method in the total study period.
- Rejection (>H1R) < 3 months
- Severe renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)
- Inability or contraindication to perform a VO2 max test
- Presence of any condition that might per se influence exercise performance
- Known contraindication for treatment with ivabradine
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of either study drug
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Placebo Study participants in this arm will receive placebo bid for a period of 12 weeks. Ivabradine Ivabradine Study participants in this arm will receive ivabradin 5 mg bid for a period of 12 weeks.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ΔVO2max The VO2max is assessed at baseline and 12 weeks follow-up. The change in VO2max (ΔVO2max) (mL/kg/min) from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up. The peak oxygen uptake (VO2max) reflects the maximal ability of a person to take in, transport and use oxygen, and it defines the functional aerobic capacity. It is used to provide an overall assessment of exercise capacity.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ΔQOL KCCQ 12 weeks Change in QOL score evaluated by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔQOL EQ-5D-5L 12 weeks Change in QOL score evaluated by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔHRrest 12 weeks Change in resting HR (beats/min) from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔHRreserve 12 weeks Change in HR reserve (beats/min) from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔLVmass 12 weeks Change in left ventricular (LV) mass (g) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔLVEF 12 weeks Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Δmitral deceleration time 12 weeks Change in mitral decelaration time (ms) evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔE/é 12 weeks Change in E/é evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔE/A ratio 12 weeks Change in E/A ratio evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Δisovolumetric relaxation time 12 weeks Change in isovolumetric relaxation time (ms) evaluated by echocardiography from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Δtransmitral flow rate 12 weeks Change in transmitral flow rate (volume/min) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Δpulmonary venous flow 12 weeks Change in pulmonary venous flow (volume/min) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔLVEDV 12 weeks Change in LVEDV (left ventricular end diastolic volume) (ml) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔLVESV 12 weeks Change in LVESV (left ventricular end systolic volume) (ml) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
ΔLV peak filling rate 12 weeks Change in left ventricular (LV) peak filling rate (volume/min) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Δtime to peak filling 12 weeks Change in time to peak filling (sec) evaluated by cardiac MRI from baseline to 12 weeks follow-up
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
🇩🇰Copenhagen, Denmark