MedPath

Compensatory Movements With Axon-Hook and Greifer in Transradial Amputees

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Transradial Amputation
Interventions
Device: Greifer then Axon-Hook
Device: Axon-Hook then Greifer
Registration Number
NCT04522349
Lead Sponsor
Otto Bock France SNC
Brief Summary

Upper limb amputees often report musculoskeletal pain due to exaggerated shoulder abduction movements. Previous studies on prosthetic hands showed that wrist orientation contributes to reduce shoulder compensatory movements. The hypothesis of this research is that prosthetic hooks may also provide better functional outcomes when offering wrist adjustments and a design that favors a good visualization of the grips. The objective of this study is to compare shoulder abduction, manual dexterity and satisfaction when using Axon-Hook and Greifer myoelectric hooks during repetitive tasks. Shoulder abduction and manual dexterity results are also compared with the sound side.

Detailed Description

Depending on patient's expectations, different prosthetic solutions can be offered. If prosthetic hands, being at the same time functional and aesthetic solutions, are widely used, for some professional or leisure activities, myoelectric users will have a better functional response with a non-morphologic terminal device such as a hook.

Axon-hook and Greifer are two myoelectric hooks proposed by Otto Bock HealthCare. Greifer (Myobock system) has two movable strong hooks and a wrist that can be orientated medially or laterally. Axon-Hook (Axon-Bus system) has thin hooks for a good visualization of the grip, one being fixed for more precision, and a flexible wrist that can be orientated and locked in flexion and extension position.

Previous studies on myoelectric hands showed that functionalities of prosthetic components such as type of hand or type of wrist, have an influence on compensatory movements, which can explain musculoskeletal pains. The hypothesis of the study is that Axon-Hook may reduce shoulder abduction and improve patient satisfaction. No significant difference is expected regarding manual dexterity.

This randomized corossover trial compares shoulder abduction, manual dexterity and satisfaction while using Axon-Hook and Greifer. Shoulder abduction and manual dexterity results are also compared with the sound side.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria
  • persons with trans-radial upper limb amputation
  • persons whose amputation is acquired or congenital
  • persons who regularily uses a myoelectric prosthesis and who controls it
  • persons whose residual limb is stabilized, with a minimum time of six month since amputation
  • persons whose profesional activity or life project justify or could justify the use of a myoelectric hook
  • persons who gave their written consent to participate to the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • persons under 18 years of age
  • pregnant woman
  • persons unable to personnaly give their consent
  • persons with psychic or linguistic inability to understand instructions for the test
  • persons unavailable to comply with the entire study protocol

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Greifer then Axon-HookGreifer then Axon-HookT0 + 2 weeks: evaluation with Greifer. T1 + 2 weeks: evaluation with Axon-Hook
Axon-Hook then GreiferAxon-Hook then GreiferT0 + 2 weeks: evaluation with Axon-Hook. T1 + 2 weeks: evaluation with Greifer
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Average shoulder abduction measureOne minute

Average measure of shoulder abuction during Box and Blocks manual dexterity test, by motion analysis

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Manual dexterityOne minute

Score at the Box and Blocks test

User satisfaction15 minutes

Score at the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)

Percentage of time spent with shoulder abduction more or equal to 60°One minute

Percentage of time spent with shoulder abduction more or equal to 60° during Box and Blocks test

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Institut Régional de Rééducation et de Réadaptation

🇫🇷

Nancy, Lorraine, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath