Comparison of RAM Cannula Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP)

Terminated

• Conditions: Acute Respiratory Deficiency; Prematurity; Assisted Ventilation

• Registration Number: NCT02032511
• Lead Sponsor: University of Michigan

Brief Summary

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness and ease of use of two commonly used NCPAP interfaces: the RAM NC and the Infant Flow prongs and nasal mask.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2013-09
• Study First Submitted: 2014-01-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-01-09
• Study First Posted: 2014-01-10
• Primary Completion: 2014-04
• Study Completion: 2014-04
• Status Verified: 2017-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-01-05
• Last Update Posted: 2017-01-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: TERMINATED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 19

Inclusion Criteria

• less than or equal to 7 kg
• order for nasal continuous positive pressure

Exclusion Criteria

• patients greater than 7kg
• patients that do not have informed consent

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of patients who achieve unassisted breathing	One year