NCT02032511终止不适用
Comparison of RAM Cannula NCPAP Versus Infant Flow NCPAP
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 19
- 主要终点
- Number of patients who achieve unassisted breathing
研究概览
简要总结
This study is designed to compare the effectiveness and ease of use of two commonly used NCPAP interfaces: the RAM NC and the Infant Flow prongs and nasal mask.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- — 至 6 Months（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •less than or equal to 7 kg
- •order for nasal continuous positive pressure
排除标准
- •patients greater than 7kg
- •patients that do not have informed consent
结局指标
主要结局
Number of patients who achieve unassisted breathing
时间窗: One year
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Michelle Pape
RRT
University of Michigan
相似试验
终止
2 期
A Trial of Infant Flow Biphasic Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure (NCPAP) Versus Infant Flow NCPAP for the Facilitation of Extubation in Infants </= 1250 GramsInfant, Premature, DiseasesApnea of PrematurityBronchopulmonary DysplasiaNCT00308789Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada136
已完成
不适用
Comparing Weaning of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) From Preterm InfantsRespiratory Distress SyndromeNCT02126501Maimonides Medical Center70
终止
不适用
A Study to Evaluate the Use of the Neotech RAM Nasal Cannula for CPAP and Bi-PAP Application in Infants 28-42 Weeks Gestation in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)Neonatal Respiratory DistressNCT04096235Englewood Hospital and Medical Center14
已完成
不适用
Comparative Effectiveness Study of Bubble CPAP Devices in the NICURespiratory Distress SyndromeNCT02392806Marya Strand, MD43
Unknown
不适用
Comparison of Two Different NCPAP Methods in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress SyndromeVentilatory FailureNCT03400670Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Research and Education Hospital400