MedPath

Pragmatic Trial Of Alerts for Use of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Interventions
Behavioral: Best Practice Alert
Registration Number
NCT04903717
Lead Sponsor
Yale University
Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine if a best practice alert (BPA) system that prompts providers to consider the addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) in eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) will result in increased prescription of this guideline-recommended therapy. The system will also inform providers about FDA-approved potassium binders for the treatment of hyperkalemia if elevated potassium is a barrier for MRA use and will provide educational information on the evidence for MRA therapy in these patients.

Detailed Description

Despite the robust literature demonstrating improved outcomes with the use of mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), MRAs continue to be underused in clinical practice. This underuse often stems from the perceived risks of hyperkalemia, including a prior history of hyperkalemia and acute or chronic kidney disease, as well as the cautioned use for those with potassium greater than 5.0 mEq/L, as recommended in national societal guidelines. New potassium binders have recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat hyperkalemia. It remains unknown if a best practice alert built into the clinical electronic health record can facilitate MRA prescription in eligible patients by providing guideline-based information about MRA recommendations and evidence, as well as informing practitioners about available treatments for hyperkalemia.

This is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, open-label interventional trial to test the comparative effectiveness of an EHR BPA system that informs practitioners about MRAs for HFrEF and, if necessary, potassium-binders that are FDA-approved for hyperkalemia, versus usual care (no alert, current standard of care). One hundred and fifty outpatient Cardiology and Internal Medicine providers (to include physicians and advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and advanced practice registered nurses)) practicing at affiliated locations will be enrolled and undergo randomization to either the intervention (alert) group or a control (usual care) group. Those in the intervention group will receive an informational alert for their eligible adult outpatients (those with HFrEF not currently prescribed an MRA). Those in the control group will not receive any alerts and will continue to care for patients as usual. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients with HFrEF who have an active prescription for an MRA at 6 months following randomization.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1210
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adults equal to or greater than 18 years of age
  • Outpatients of providers randomized into the study within Internal Medicine and Cardiology outpatient clinics
  • Diagnosis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF less than or equal to 40% on the most recent TTE)
  • Registration in the Yale Heart Failure Registry (NCT04237701)
  • Not currently prescribed an MRA
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Absolute contraindication to MRAs
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intervention - Best Practice AlertBest Practice AlertProviders randomized to the intervention arm will have a best practice alert appear for each of their eligible patients upon opening of the order entry screen in the patient's medical record which alerts to the presence of HFrEF and the fact that the patient is not currently prescribed an MRA. A link to an order set for MRAs (or to potassium binders should a patient be hyperkalemic) will provided, along with a link to current best practices surrounding the use of MRAs.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of patients with an active prescription for an MRAMeasured at 6 months post-randomization

Proportion of patients with an active prescription for an MRA, defined as a prescription present in the electronic health record for any drug in the MRA class that is active (not expired) and has remaining doses left at 6 months after the date of randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rates Outpatient visitsMeasured at 1 monnh post randomization

Rates of outpatient visits

Rate of Outpatient visitsMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Rates of outpatient visits

All-cause mortalityMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Rates of all-cause mortality

Percentage of patients with potassium binder prescriptionMeasured at 6 months post randomization

Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders

Rates of Heart failure-related hospital admissionsMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Rates of HF-related hospital admissions (uses computations phenotype)

Number of MRA prescriptionsWithin one year post randomization

Number of any MRA prescription during study period.

Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.0) with MRAWithin one year post randomization

Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L) with an active MRA prescription

Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.5) with MRAWithin one year post randomization

Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L) with an active MRA prescription

Percentage of patients with potassium binder + MRA prescriptionMeasured at 6 months post randomization

Percentage of participants with active prescription for potassium binders and MRA

Rationale for provider not prescribing an MRA if indicated (intervention group only)Any rationale provided within one year post randomization

Provider-documented (via the best practice alert) rationale for not prescribing indicated MRA (intervention group only)

Rationale for provider not prescribing a potassium binder if indicated (intervention group only)Any rationale provided within one year post randomization

Provider-documented (via the best practice alert) rationale for not prescribing indicated potassium binder (intervention group only)

Percentage of patients with ED visitsMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Percentage of patients with any ED visit

ED visit countMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Count of ED visits per patient

Rates of documented hyperkalemia during a hospital HF admissionWithin one year post randomization

Documented hyperkalemia (K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L) at an HF-related hospital admission

Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoringWithin one year post randomization

Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring

Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring +/- potassium binderWithin one year post randomization

Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring for those with an active prescription of potassium binder vs. not

Percentage of MRA prescriptions filledWithin 30 days of written prescription

Percentage of prescriptions filled of initial MRA prescriptions written during the study period.

Time to first MRA prescriptionFrom enrollment to time of MRA prescription

Time (in days) to first MRA prescription

Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.0)Within one year post randomization

Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L)

Type of potassium binder prescribedFirst potassium binder prescribed at any point between enrollment and study completion

Type of first potassium binder prescribed

Rate of ED visit + IV diureticsMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Rates of total ED visits in which a dose of IV diuretics was given

Total healthcare associated costsMeasured at 12 months post randomization

Total healthcare-associated cost per patient

Rates of documented hyperkalemia at an ED visitWithin one year post randomization

Documented hyperkalemia (K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L) at an ED visit

Rates of documented hyperkalemia at an outpatient visitWithin one year post randomization

Documented hyperkalemia (K ≥ 5.5 mEq/L) at an outpatient visit

Percentage of patients with Hyperkalemia (K>5.5)Within one year post randomization

Percentage of patients experiencing hyperkalemia (K greater than or equal to 5.5 mEq/L)

Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring +/- MRAWithin one year post randomization

Frequency of outpatient potassium monitoring for those with an active prescription of MRA vs. not

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cardiology/Internal Medicine Outpatient Clinics of Yale New Health System

🇺🇸

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath