The accuracy of carotid, femoral and brachial artery measurements compared to conventional intra-vascular methods of flow-related parameters
- Conditions
- 10019280blood flow measurementsnon-invasive cardiac output monitoring
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON46523
- Lead Sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Adult patient (age > 18 years)
- Elective open GI surgery
- ASA 1-2
- Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring
- Informed consent
- Known significant occlusion, recent intra-arterial intervention or abnormal anatomy of aortic, femoral, carotid or brachial artery
- Cerebrovascular accident
- Atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardias
- COPD stage 3-4
- Lobectomy / pneumectomy
- Active pneumonia
- Cardiac failure
- Severe heart valve regurgitation or stenosis (grade 3+)
- Not able to measure brachial or carotid artery blood flow during surgery
- Contra-indications for femoral arterial catheter placement (e.g., vascular graft)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Femoral, carotid and brachial ultrasound determined blood flow, intermittent<br /><br>transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output and stroke volume determined by<br /><br>pulse-contour analysis (invasive and non-invasive) right before induction and<br /><br>under anaesthesia. When a change in preload is anticipated (e.g. a fluid bolus,<br /><br>start of vasopressors, and Trendelenburg position), before and after this<br /><br>preload change measurements will be performed.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method