MedPath

Supervision Models in Training Environments

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Supervision
Anesthesia
Interventions
Behavioral: Survey
Registration Number
NCT05075278
Lead Sponsor
Rhode Island Hospital
Brief Summary

Attending physicians often supervise novice junior residents in a direct one-to-one format. Alternatively, a senior resident can be paired with a new trainee under the non-direct (but immediately available) supervision of an attending physician. Resident supervision has been considered an important step towards independent practice. Both models are ubiquitous in the United States, but no study to date has been performed if one model is better than the other with respect to supervision scores.

Detailed Description

Supervision of residents is a cornerstone of ACGME accreditation and a critical focus of any training program. A nine-faceted, validated survey has been used to assess quality and effectiveness of supervision in training environments. Residents that assign poor scores for faculty members also tend to poorly evaluate the department-at-large. Further, residents that evaluate supervisors unfavorably also tend to report more patient safety mishaps in the context of a less safe work environment. Previous literature that used this supervision scale concluded that residents who reported mean department-wide supervision scores less than 3 (frequent) reported significantly more frequent occurrences of mistakes with negative consequences to patients and medication errors.

Attending physicians often supervise novice junior residents in a direct one-to-one format. Alternatively, a senior resident can be paired with a new trainee under the non-direct (but immediately available) supervision of an attending physician. Resident supervision has been considered an important step towards independent practice.. Both models are ubiquitous in the United States, but no study to date has been performed if one model is better than the other with respect to supervision scores.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • New incoming anesthesia residents assigned to healthy patients (ASA physical status classifications of 1 or 2).
Exclusion Criteria
  • New incoming anesthesia residents assigned to patients with ASA physical status classifications 3 or greater.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Senior resident for direct 1:1 supervisionSurveyParticipants will be assigned to an senior resident as a direct supervisor with oversight from an attending physician (in accordance with CMS/ACGME staffing criteria). The participants will fill out a survey at the end of the day for 16 consecutive days.
Attending physician for direct 1:1 supervisionSurveyParticipants will be assigned to an attending physician for direct 1:1 supervision. The participants will fill out a survey at the end of the day for 16 consecutive days.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Supervision evaluation questionnaireAt the conclusion of each day for 16 consecutive days

A series of questions pertaining to planning perianesthesia care, feedback, availability, opportunities, stimulating patient based learning, professionalism, interpersonal skills, presence, and safety. It questions are scored using a 4-point Likert scale (never = 1, rarely = 2, frequently = 3, and always = 4). A score less than 3 is associated with more frequent occurrences of mistakes.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Short FormAt the conclusion of each day for 16 consecutive days

(Strongly agree=5, Agree=4, Neither=3, Disagree=2, Strongly Disagree=1).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rhode Island Hospital

🇺🇸

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath