MedPath

The Effects of Use of Auditory Stimulation Methods on Cardiac Patients' Clinical Outcomes

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chest Pain
Anxiety
Sleep
Registration Number
NCT06670027
Lead Sponsor
Damanhour University
Brief Summary

This study will be used to compare the effects of two auditory stimulation methods on improving vital signs parameters, reducing the severity of chest pain, and improving the sleep quality of cardiac patients.

Detailed Description

This study aims to To evaluate the relative efficacy of two auditory stimulation techniques in enhancing cardiac patients' vital sign assessments.

* This study aims to examine two auditory stimulations for their ability to alleviate chest pain in patients with heart conditions.

* The goal of this study is to evaluate two audio stimulations for their potential to help heart patients have a better night's rest.

This research made use of two different therapies including audio stimulation. Group A used familiar auditory stimulus, which was a spoken message, and group B used sounds of nature.

Patients with preexisting cardiac conditions who were admitted to a predetermined critical care unit and who subsequently intended to have percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • adult (aged≥18 years).
  • diagnosed with cardiac disease.
  • patient with hemodynamic stability
  • consciousness and ability to communicate.
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients unable to comply with study interventions
  • patients with cognitive impairment
  • patients with severe unstable cardiac condition
  • having a history of hearing loss or the use of a hearing aid.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
level of anxiety and depressionthree days after intervention

The hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire consisted of 14 questions 7 for anxiety and 7 for depression score score 0-7 mean normal; score 8-10 mean mild; score 11-15, mean moderate; and score 16-21, mean severely

sleep qualitythree days after intervention

sleep quality used Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). it consisted of five items score from zero mean poor pattern and 100 mean good

severity of chest painthree days after intervention

Visual analogue scale consisted of score from 0 to 10 zero mean no pain and 10 mean high pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of nursing Damanhour university

🇪🇬

Damanhūr, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath