Thrombin Generation Parameters and Bleeding in Patients Treated With Anticoagulants for Cancer Associated Thrombosis
- Conditions
- Pulmonary EmbolismCancerThrombosis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06386107
- Brief Summary
Pulmonary embolism, the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, is effectively treated with anticoagulants. In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), the use of anticoagulants is associated with 10 to 15% of bleeding in the first 6 months. Most of the guidelines propose to integrate the bleeding risk in the choice of therapies. Thrombin generation assay (TGA) reflects an overall hemostatic response and could be a useful biomarker. Proven on the thrombotic side in the CAT population, useful in the assessment of the bleeding risk of hemophiliac patients, the TGA is emerging as a tool. The investigators to measure TGA in cancer patients included prospectively, having recently developed a CAT and to evaluate the association between the measurement and the risk of hemorrhagic complication under anticoagulant during the first 6 month of treatment.
- Detailed Description
Pulmonary embolism, the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, is effectively treated with anticoagulants. In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), the use of anticoagulants is associated with 10 to 15% of bleeding in the first 6 months. Most of the guidelines propose to integrate the bleeding risk in the choice of therapies. Existing models for predicting anticoagulant associated bleeding risk applied to the CAT patients are not very predictive (AUC\<0.60). Thrombin generation assay (TGA) reflects an overall hemostatic response and could be a useful biomarker. Proven on the thrombotic side in the CAT population, useful in the assessment of the bleeding risk of hemophiliac patients, the TGA is emerging as a tool. The investigators wish to measure TGA in cancer patients included prospectively, having recently developed a CAT and to evaluate the association between the measurement and the risk of hemorrhagic complication under anticoagulant during the first 6 month of treatment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 212
- Patients with active cancer, as defined by current French recommendations (Mahé I et al Rev Mal Respir 2021)
- Presenting acute proximal deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb (DVT) and/or proximal pulmonary embolism (PE), confirmed by objective tests (Doppler ultrasound in the event of DVT; lung scintigraphy or CT scan in the event of PE)
- No contraindication for anticoagulant treatment at a curative dose at the time of inclusion
- Patients participating in a therapeutic clinical trial with blinded therapy will be excluded.
- Patients already on anticoagulant at a curative dose for valvular or rhythmic embolic disease or a history of venous thromboembolic disease
- Hematological malignancies
- Patients with a contraindication to anticoagulant treatment on inclusion
- Patient whose relay by DOAC has already been carried out.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients with cancer associated thrombosis under curative anticoagulant treatment Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) Patients with cancer associated thrombosis under curative anticoagulant treatment.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The measurement of the area under the curve ( endogenious thrombin potential) nMxmin during the first 6 months of treatment The measurment of the endogenious thrombin potential, during the first 6 months of treatment
the measurement of the lag time unit = seconds during the first 6 months of treatment the measurement of the lag time, during the first 6 months of treatment
the measurement of the peak height unit = nm during the first 6 months of treatment the measurement of the peak height during the first 6 months of treatment.
the measurement of the time to peak unit = seconds during the first 6 months of treatment the mesearurement of the time to peak, during the first 6 months of treatment.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Occurrence of an event of interest under treatment Month : 1 to 6 Occurrence of an event of interest under treatment (recurrence of CAT, death, clinically relevant bleeding event) during the 6 months of follow-up, according to the TGT assessment at inclusion.
Occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding between m1 and m6, based on the change in TGT Month 1; Month 6 Occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding between m1 and m6, based on the change in TGT (between inclusion and m1)
Effect of adding TGT results on the performance of bleeding risk prediction scores Month 1; Month 6 Effect of adding TGT results on the performance (via AUC) of bleeding risk prediction scores.
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Chu Clermont-Ferrand
🇫🇷Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU de Grenoble
🇫🇷Grenoble, France
HCL
🇫🇷Lyon, France
Chu St-Etienne
🇫🇷Saint-Étienne, France