MedPath

Immediate Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction (Strattice Breast)

Completed
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Registration Number
NCT00619762
Lead Sponsor
LifeCell
Brief Summary

This prospective, multicenter, open-label study will assess the clinical outcomes of the LTM product in three planned analyses. The primary objective of this study is to prospectively assess the clinical outcomes associated with the use of LTM in two-stage (expander then permanent implant) immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.

Detailed Description

nothing to add

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
17
Inclusion Criteria
  • A candidate for immediate, two-stage breast reconstruction using LTM following a skin sparing mastectomy
  • An ASA Physical Status Classification5 of 1 or 2 (see App I)
  • Estimated life expectancy > 1 year
Exclusion Criteria
  • Clinically significant systemic disease
  • Received inductive chemo-therapy within 2 months prior to mastectomy or radiation therapy to the region at any time
  • Predicted excised breast mass of >750 gms
  • Co-morbid factors which predispose to postoperative infection, such as insulin dependent diabetes, smoking, chronic steroid use, malnourishment, or co-existent infection
  • Need for tissue flap in addition to expander
  • History of alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, significant mental illness, physical dependence to any opioid, or drug abuse or addiction
  • Enrollment or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study that would affect the patient's safety or results of this trial
  • Any of the conditions identified within the labeled contraindications, i.e. sensitivity to porcine derived products or polysorbate

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Histology Sample Evaluations Assessing Incorporation of StratticeTM Reconstructive Tissue MatrixAt the time of expander/implant exchange (Stage II),

Evaluation of 3 histology parameters, fibroblast infiltration, immune cell response \& revascularization, expressed as frequency distributions. Samples evaluated for presence of fibroblasts (cellularity), neovascularization \& immune cell response using 4 pt scale. Fibroblast Infiltration: 1=None,2=Few,sparse,3=Moderate,4=Dense. Revascularization:1=None,2=Few randomly dispersed capillaries,3=Moderate; mostly homogenous distribution of new vessels,4=Significant,uniformly distributed vessels; both capillaries and arterioles. Immune Cell response: 1= None,2=Few,normal healing response,3=Moderate,4=Significant;above expected presence for healing. 4 high power(HP)fields reviewed \& if uniform in appearance/cellular distribution, 4 considered representative of sample as a whole. If non-uniform distribution observed, 3 HP fields of "sparse or light" distribution \& 3 HP fields of dense distribution counted \& results averaged. Tissue sample then assessed for overall acellularity \& expressed as %.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Severity of Local Inflammation at and Around the Surgical SitePostoperative Day 7, 14, 21, 30 days

The Inflammatory response was evaluated by each of the four cardinal signs: erythema, edema, pain and heat, using standard scales for the evaluation of each sign and inflammation as a whole was assessed using a model (AIR Score) which took into account the scores assigned to each of the four signs. A mean score is provided at each timepoint.The minimum total possible score is 4 (less inflamation) and the maximum total possible score is 8 (more inflammation).

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath