MedPath

Comparison Between Radiofrequency Ablation and Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation for Recurrent/Residual HCC

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Recurrent Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Residual Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Interventions
Procedure: radiofrequency ablation
Radiation: Proton beam therapy
Registration Number
NCT01963429
Lead Sponsor
National Cancer Center, Korea
Brief Summary

This phase 3 study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the comparison between radiofrequency ablation and hypofractionated proton beam radiation.

Detailed Description

The sample size for this study was based on a non-inferiority design. Primary objective: estimate local progression-free survival (LPFS) rate in two treatments Primary endpoint: 2-year LPFS rate Expected 2-year LPFS rate in the RFA: 85% Accural time and follow up time: 24 months and 24 months, respectively. Precision for 2-year LPFS rate estimation: Allowing a difference of 15% as the non-inferiority margin, with a power of 80% and a type I error level of 5%, evaluable 68 patients are required.

Considering 5% of follow-up loss, we need 72 patients in each arm, so a total of 144 patients will be enrolled.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
144
Inclusion Criteria
  • HCC diagnosed as (i) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level greater than 200 IU/ml and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in one or more CT/MRI/angiograms, or (ii) the presence of risk factors including hepatitis B or C virus and liver cirrhosis, a serum a-fetoprotein (AFP) level less than 200 IU/ml, and a radiologically compatible feature with HCC in two or more CT/MRI/angiograms or (iii) histological confirmation
  • HCC patients who had recurrent or residual tumor after other treatments
  • without evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • the largest diameter of tumor should be less than 3cm, and the number of tumor ≤2
  • no previous treatment to target tumors by other forms of RT
  • liver function of Child-Pugh class A or B7 (Child-Pugh score of ≤7)
  • Age of ≥18 years
  • performance status of 0 to 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
  • WBC count ≥ 2,000/mm3; hemoglobin level ≥ 7.5 g/dL; platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3; and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤ 3.0 mg/dL; AST and ALT < 5.0× upper limit of normal; no ascites)
  • no serious comorbidities other than liver cirrhosis
  • written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • evidence of extrahepatic metastasis
  • age < 18 years
  • liver function of Child-Pugh class B8-9 and C (Child-Pugh score of >7) or uncontrolled cases of active chronic hepatitis B
  • previous history of other forms of RT adjacent to target tumors
  • poor performance status of 3 to 4 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
  • pregnant or breast feeding status
  • previous history uncontrolled other malignancies within 2 years

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
A(radiofrequency ablation )radiofrequency ablationradiofrequency ablation
B(Proton)Proton beam therapyhypofractionated proton beam therapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
local progression-free survival(LPES)up to 2 year

To evaluate the local progression-free survival for 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
disease-free survival (DFS)up to 2 years until study closed

Disease-free survival was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to date of detection study closed

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Cancer Center, Korea

🇰🇷

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath