Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Gingival Recession
• Interventions: Procedure: VISTA Technique; Procedure: modified coronally advanced flap

• Registration Number: NCT03328442
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Detailed Description

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.

Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively.

Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-10-29
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-10-29
• Study First Posted: 2017-11-01
• Status Verified: 2018-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-01-14
• Last Update Posted: 2018-01-17
• Study Start: 2018-03
• Primary Completion: 2020-02
• Study Completion: 2020-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 16

Inclusion Criteria

• Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG>2 mm

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Vista technique	VISTA Technique	The vista technique with PRF membrane uses a Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access in combination with Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects.
modified coronally advanced flap	modified coronally advanced flap	A modified coronally advanced flap utilising Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient satisfaction	after 6 months	Using a questionnaire which are designed in a dichotomous fashion (yes or no ) and calculated by percentage of answering yes.; it not a scale, the following questions will be asked to the patients; 1. did you feel pain in spite of the medication prescribed?; 2. did you perceive the course of healing unexpected restriction?; 3. did you experience any remaining symptoms of parasethesia?; 4. would you described the under taken effort as reasonable?; 5. have your expectations been fulfilled?