跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/12/099296
CTRI/2025/12/099296尚未招募4 期

A Randomised Comparative Study To Compare Efficacy Of Intravenous Lignocaine Versus Labetalol Versus Esmolol For Attenuating The Haemodynamic Response To Laryngoscopy And Endotracheal Intubation At S.M.S Medical College Jaipur.

SMS Medical College Jaipur1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 153 人开始时间: 2026年1月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
153
试验地点
1
主要终点
To assess and compare the effect of intravenous lignocaine verus labetalol versus esmolol on haemodynamic parameters (HR,SBP,DBP,MAP) to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized controlled study is aimed to study the effects of intravenous lignocaine (1mg per kg) versus intravenous labetalol (0.25mg per kg) versus intravenous esmolol (0.5mg per kg) for attenuating the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients are  randomly assigned to receive either iv lignocaine ,iv labetalol or iv esmolol  during the perioperative period. Haemodynamic parameters and side effects assesed at different intervals post intubation .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patient who will give written informed consent.
  • Scheduled for urgent or elective procedures requiring endotracheal anaesthesia.
  • Classified as American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physiccal status I to II.
  • Patients age between 18 and 60 years.

排除标准

  • 1.Any contraindication or history of hypersensitivity to study drugs.
  • Presence of atrioventricular block of any degree.
  • History of cardiac arrhythmias or heart failure.
  • presence of kidney disease.
  • Body mass index(BMI)more than 25kgm2 6.Mallampatti grade 3 and 4 7.

结局指标

主要结局

To assess and compare the effect of intravenous lignocaine verus labetalol versus esmolol on haemodynamic parameters (HR,SBP,DBP,MAP) to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

时间窗: At 0,1,5 and 10 minutes after intubation.

次要结局

  • To assess and compare proportion of patients developing any side effects.(Hypotension,Bradycardia,others)(At 0,1,5 and 10 minutes after intubation)

研究者

发起方
SMS Medical College Jaipur
申办方类型
Government medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Sunil Chauhan

SMS Medical College Jaipur

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A Study Comparing Three Drugs Intravenous Lignocaine... | 临床试验