Comparison of clinical efficiency of two tooth coloured, 3D printed resin crowns versus stainless steel crowns for primary molars
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062626
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Aroonika Bedre
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
1) Children aged between 4 to 8 years falling under Frankl’s behavior rating scale criteria 2, 3 and 4.
2) Presence of at least one carious maxillary or mandibular primary molar indicated for pulpectomy.
3) Primary molars with irreversible pulpitis or non-vital pulp which show a restorable tooth structure (adequate sound coronal tooth structure) and have an adequate periodontal support which is confirmed by periapical radiographic examinations.
4) Children whose parents gave consent to participate in the study.
1) Children with special health care needs.
2) Children with underlying any systemic conditions.
3) Children who are allergic to local anaesthesia or any of the materials used in the study.
4) Teeth which show extensive mobility, and advanced root resorption or other indications for extraction
5) Carious teeth exhibiting pre shedding mobility.
6)The presence of bone rare fraction involving more than a half of the root, severe mobility or resorption of more than half of the root or root perforations.
7) Tooth with underfilled or overfilled obturation.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The functional, biological and aesthetic properties of 3D printed resin endocrowns and full coverage crowns are comparable to that of stainless steel crowns.Timepoint: 1, 3 and 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The periodontal health of primary molars restored with 3D printed endocrowns and full coverage crowns are comparable to that of stainless steel crowns.Timepoint: 1, 3 and 6 months.