Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03241602
NCT03241602CompletedPhase 4

Multimodal Analgesic Technique for Control of Post-laproscopy Abdominal Pain in Patient Undergoing Diagnostic Gynacological Laproscopy. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cairo University1 site in 1 country88 target enrollmentStarted: August 15, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
88
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Postoperative pain measuring 6 hours postoperative

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The advancement of laparoscopy and minimal access surgery has greatly influenced the evolution of anaesthetic techniques. However, postoperative pain intensity may be significant, with up to 40% of patients unsatisfied by routine analgesia and up to 80%may require rescue opioids during their hospital stay. Diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy has no origin of pain other than the abdominal gas insufflations itself only. Pain relief after diagnostic laparoscopy, being a day case, is an issue of great practical importance.The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of combining both pulmonary recruitment and intraperitoneal lidocaine versus pulmonary recruitment alone to control post - laparoscopy shoulder pain regarding severity and frequency

Study Design :

Interventional Prospective Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial

Methodology This study is a randomized double blinded control trial. It will be conducted at Kasr-al ainy hospital, faculty of medicine, Cairo university. Approval of ethical committee and written informed consent will be obtained. 88 female patients, aged 18-45 years , ASA 1 or 2 , scheduled for diagnostic gynaecologic laparoscopy will be included. Females who are (ASA) ≥ 3, alcoholic, drug abusers, allergic to amide LAs, with pre-existing chronic pain disorders, or receiving opioids or tranquilizers for > 1 week preoperatively are excluded. Also if the operation included any interventional procedure or was converted to an open procedure, or had postoperative complications that could increase postoperative pain, it will be excluded. Consenting patients will be randomly allocated to either of three study groups : GPL : Patients will receive pulmonary recruitment maneuver and intraperitoneal lidocaine. GPS: Patients will receive pulmonary recruitment maneuver and intraperitoneal saline. GC : Patients will receive passive exsufflation through the port site. The patient will attend at the pre anaesthetic room 1 hour before the procedure. A 20 Gauge cannula will be inserted peripherally and the patient will be premedicated with intravenous Midazolam 0.02 mg kg-1, Ranitidine 50 mg, 10 mg Metoclopramide.

In the operative room, standard monitoring will be applied to the patient. Anaesthesia will be induced with propofol 2 mg kg-1, Fentanyl 1 mcg kg-1 , Atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1 and the trachea will be intubated after mask ventilation for 3 minutes. Anaesthesia will be maintained with IPPV , isoflurane in 100% oxygen and muscular relaxation with atracurium 0.1mg kg-1every 15 minutes. Depth of anaesthesia was adjusted according to clinical signs. Laparoscopy is done using CO2 as distension medium. The patient will be placed in a Trendelenburg position in order to provide optimum conditions for laparoscopic view. In groups GPL and GPS , the investigator prepares syringes 1.75 ml/kg of 0.2% lidocaine (3.5 mg/kg) or the same volume of normal saline, for intraperitoneal administration. This ensures the surgeon and the anaesthesiologist are blind to the patient's group. The solution to be instilled will be splashed under the right diaphragmatic area by the surgeon and complete the procedure. At the end of the procedure, the patient will be placed back from trendelenburg position. In groups GPL and GPS , a pulmonary recruitment maneuver will be done and consist of five manual pulmonary inflations with a maximum pressure of 40 cm H2O. The anesthesiologist hold the fifth positive pressure inflation for approximately 5 seconds. In group GC CO2 will be removed by passive exsufflation through the port site and gentle abdominal pressure will be applied to evacuate the residual gas. Residual neuromuscular block is antagonized with atropine 1.2 mg and neostigmine 2.5 mg and extubation will be done according to extubation criteria. In the recovery room, patient will be asked about post-operative pain and it'll be controlled using Meperidine 1 mg kg-1 and given by a nurse who is unaware of the nature of the intraoperative analgesia. Then, the patient is discharged to the ward according to the standard criteria. In the ward, patient will be asked to fulfill a questionnaire at 6, 8 and 10 hours postoperative using the visual analogue score (VAS) of pain severity. Patients were questioned as to presence of Side effects (nausea, vomiting).

Possible Risk : Pneumothorax , Local anaesthetic toxicity : CNS depression (lightheadedness and dizziness, difficulty focusing, tinnitus, confusion, and circumoral numbness) , excitation ( tremors tonic-clonic convulsions) , respiratory depression and cardiac dysrhythmias .

Detailed Description

The advancement of laparoscopy and minimal access surgery has greatly influenced the evolution of anaesthetic techniques. However, postoperative pain intensity may be significant, with up to 40% of patients unsatisfied by routine analgesia and up to 80%may require rescue opioids during their hospital stay. Diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy has no origin of pain other than the abdominal gas insufflations itself only. Pain relief after diagnostic laparoscopy, being a day case, is an issue of great practical importance. Pain after Laparoscopy is considered to arise from 3 main sources: the incision sites (50% to 70%), the pneumoperitoneum (20% to 30%) in association with both local (peritoneal and diaphragmatic stretching, ischemia, acidosis) and systemic (hypercarbia causing sympathetic nervous system excitation resulting in amplification of the local tissue inflammatory response) changes, and the procedure site (10% to 20%) as postcholecystectomy wound within the liver. Pain can also be referred from the subdiaphragmatic region as shoulder pain. Shoulder pain is often mild in intensity and can remain for 24 hours. Incisional pain is usually mild to moderate in intensity, and maximal immediately postoperatively, subsiding with time. Local anaesthetic (LA) to be filtered preincisional can not entirely eliminate postoperative pain, especially shoulder pain, In contrast, Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation is a known method of providing post-laparoscopy pain relief. Lidocaine is safe and effective in pain relief, improving respiratory functions and early return of bowel motility. The local anaesthetic blocks visceral nociception from the peritoneum locally as well as a having a systemic effect after absorption through the peritoneal surface . The systemic analgesic effect of LA is induced through an anti-inflammatory effect by peripheral suppression of acute chemically induced pain, inhibition of nerve conduction, as well as having a central antihyperalgesic effect. The pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre (RM) can mechanically remove residual carbon dioxide (CO2) after laparoscopic surgery, reduce phrenic nerve irritation, and consequently reduce post-laparoscopic shoulder and upper abdominal pain. The combined effect of these two methods ,using various local anaesthetics , on pain following laparoscopic procedures has not been reported. This study will investigate the efficacy of combining local anaesthetic infiltration of Lidocaine with pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre on postoperative pain following diagnostic Gynaecologic laparoscopy. For blinding, Pulmonary recruitment maneuver will be combined with intraperitoneal instillation of saline. However, intraperitoneal saline is a known simple maneuver to decrease shoulder pain. A possible explanation is that saline displaces residual pockets of gas from within the peritoneal cavity and thereby prevents loss of suction support between the liver and diaphragm. In this study we hypothesized that combining simple maneuver like pulmonary recruitment with intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic would be more effective than pulmonary recruitment alone.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of combining both pulmonary recruitment and intraperitoneal lidocaine versus pulmonary recruitment alone to control post - laparoscopy shoulder pain regarding severity and frequency

Study Design :

Interventional Prospective Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial

Study Methods

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 45 Years (Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female patients, aged 18-45 years scheduled for diagnostic Gynaecologic laparoscopy.
  • American Society of Anesthesiology physical status 1 or 2.

Exclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status ≥ 3
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to amide type local anaesthetics;
  • Pre-existing chronic pain disorders;
  • Receiving opioids or tranquilizers for > 1 week preoperatively;
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse.
  • If the operation included any interventional procedure or was converted to an open procedure, or had postoperative complications that could increase postoperative pain

Arms & Interventions

group of Pulmonary recruitment & Intraperitoneal libocai

Active Comparator

Intervention: Combined intraperitoneal lidocaine and pulmonary recruitment maneuver (Combination Product)

Group of Intraperitoneal lidocaine

Active Comparator

Intervention: Intraperitoneal lidocaine (Drug)

Group of pulmonary recruitment

Active Comparator

Intervention: Pulmonary Recruitment (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Postoperative pain measuring 6 hours postoperative

Time Frame: 6 hours post-oprative

post-operative pain measured using Visual Analogue Scale ,The patients were asked to complete a 10-cm linear analogue scale for shoulder pain, which ranged from 0 for no pain at all to 10 for the worst pain imaginable

Secondary Outcomes

  • Post-operative Pain measuring Visual analogue scale 8 and 10 hour(8 , 10 Hours Post-operative)
  • Post-operative Nausea and Vomitting(2 hours)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Sherin Refaat

lecturer of Anesthiology at faculty of medicine Cairo univeristy

Cairo University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials