MedPath

The Effect of Consumption of Kiwifruit on Constipation in Adults

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Constipation
Interventions
Other: Kiwifruit
Registration Number
NCT02215785
Lead Sponsor
Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina
Brief Summary

Constipation is a symptom suffered by a large number of people, due to multifactorial causes. Some studies have proven that modifying lifestyle reduces the risk of constipation, with high-fibre diets being less prone to constipation. Kiwifruit consumption, improves functional constipation and some studies consistently report an increase in the frequency and ease of defecation, stool volume and softness.

Although literature suggests kiwifruit consumption improves constipation symptoms, no studies have been carried out in adults and in Mediterranean patient populations, characteristic for its differential nutritional habits. The aim of the present study was to test the effect of kiwifruit consumption on functional constipation in a Spanish adult population.

Detailed Description

Worldwide general population prevalence of constipation ranges from 0.7% to 79% (median 16%). Some factors associated with constipation are sex, with higher prevalence in females (especially during pregnancy, and age; in general it becomes gradually more prevalent after the 70 years of age, in women the increase is considerable from a young age (18-23 years old) to middle age (45-50 years old).

Constipation is characterized by difficult or infrequent deposition, often accompanied by excessive straining during bowel movement or sensation of incomplete evacuation. In most cases, there is no underlying organic cause, and constipation is labelled as chronic idiopathic constipation and as a functional digestive disorder. The Rome III criteria is a useful tool for the diagnosis of constipation that highlights the chronic nature of the disorder and the importance of symptoms beyond the infrequency of bowel movements.

Understanding its causes, prevention, and treatment will help most people find constipation relief. An individual's medical history is very important in determining a constipation diagnosis. Primary healthcare professionals should enquire about dietary habits and lifestyle, pharmacological and toxic habits, complementary and alternative medicine, physiological bowel habits, use of laxatives and past disease history

Aims:

To test the effect of kiwifruit consumption on functional constipation in a Spanish adult population

Methods:

Design :Open non-controlled and non-randomized longitudinal study, of the effect of kiwifruit consumption in adult patients with diagnosed constipation

Setting: The study was conducted in five primary healthcare centres in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Period Study: Between April and August 2013

Population: Fifteen participating Primary Care Professionals selected patients from the electronic medical records (e-HCAP) following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each professional could include a maximum of 4 patients. Forty-six subjects were selected for the study

Sample size: It was calculated to detect a change in the proportion of individuals with 3 or more defecations per week from 56% to 86% (evolution from an average of 3.2 to 4.4 -stable Standard Deviation (SD) of 1.3- in a normal distribution). Assuming a bilateral contrast for paired data, with a significance level of 0.05 and power of 0.8, a sample of 44 individuals was required (covering a 10% of dropout rate).

Intervention: The duration of the study was five weeks. During the first two weeks no kiwifruit patients were asked to follow their normal diet. The next three weeks they were asked to consume three Zespri green kiwifruits (Actinidia deliciosa var Hayward) per day, one at each main meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner). Throughout the five-week study period the patient had to continue their normal eating habits and exercise regime.

Tools and instructions: Primary Care Professionals asked patients to participate in the study and explained it to them. Patients who voluntarily agreed to participate signed the informed consent, accepting all study procedures. Each participant in the study attended three consultations: the first one before starting the study, the second one after two weeks and the third one after five weeks.

To collect the information patients used a questionnaire designed for this purpose. His/her Primary Care Professional provided instructions on the recording of faecal characteristics. The French original version of the diary was translated into Spanish and Catalan. Patients chose their own language to respond. Professionals collected data from diaries in a Google Docs form.

Patients were supplied kiwifruits in a heterogeneous manner. Some patients in the study bought the prescribed product. In other cases it was the professional who provided the kiwifruits. In one of the Primary Care Centres, the neighbourhood shopkeeper was the responsible for delivering the kiwifruits to the patients. Patients who bought their own Zespri kiwifruit were refunded.

Statistical analysis: Demographics for patients were summarized calculating medians \[InterQuartile Range (IQR)\] for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Categorical variables were compared from baseline (second week) to last week using the Bhapkar test. For some analyses, Facility and Volume categorical variables were treated as continuous in order to provide results easy to interpret and taking into account individuals' correlations; in these cases, one unit of gain should be interpreted as an improvement in one response category. Functional data methodology was used for some graphical representations. Stacked barplots over time will be presented for categorical variables. To analyse week changes in daily variables Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models were adjusted (treating variables as continuous).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
46
Inclusion Criteria
  • Two or more of the following:

Straining during at least 25% of defecations Lumpy or hard stools in at least 25% of defecations Sensation of incomplete evacuation for at least 25% of defecations Sensation of anorectal obstruction/blockage for at least 25% of defecations Manual manoeuvres to facilitate at least 25% of defecations (e.g., digital evacuations and support of the pelvic floor) Fewer than three defecations per week; and

  • Loose stools are rarely present without the use of laxatives;
  • Insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome;
  • Criteria fulfilled for at least 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months before diagnosis.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with allergy to kiwifruit or latex
  • Patients who have undergone gastro-intestinal surgery in the last year
  • Patients taking medication to treat constipation
  • Patients with oncological disease
  • Patients taking narcotic medication
  • Patients with organic gastroenterological diseases (except non- complicated diverticulosis).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
kiwifruit cohortKiwifruitPatients that presented at Primary Care Centres with registered -Roma III criteria based- constipation and who accepted to participate in the study were followed-up for two weeks before intervention and three weeks under 3-daily kiwifruit intake.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of patients with three or more stools per weekFive weeks

Number of patients with three or more stools among participants Number of diary depositions recorded in a self adminitered questionnaire designed for this purpose

Frequency of stool per weekFive weeks

Number of diary depositions recorded in a self adminitered questionnaire designed for this purpose

Number of responders (increase of ≥ 1 stool per week)Five weeks

Number of people increasing more ≥ 1stool for week recorded in a self adminitered questionnaire designed for this purpose

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Volume of stoolFive weeks

Classified as: very little (1), little (2), medium (3), reasonably much (4), a lot (5).

Satisfaction of the patient.Five weeks

Patients answer eight questions related to the improvement of defecation habits and quality of life.

Ease of defecationFive weeks

Classified as: very easy (1), easy (2), normal (3), difficult (4), very difficult (5).

Consistency of stoolFive weeks

Bristol Scale: classified as Type 1 (Separate hard lumps, like nuts -hard to pass), Type 2 (Sausage-shaped, but lumpy), Type 3 (Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface), Type 4 (Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft), Type 5 (Soft blobs with clear cut edges -passed easily-), Type 6 (Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool), or Type 7 (Watery, no solid pieces. Entirely liquid).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Jordi Gol Gurina Foundation

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath