MedPath

Feasibility of Early Swallowing and Speech Intervention for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated SURGically

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Dysphagia
Head and Neck Cancer
Registration Number
NCT06192771
Lead Sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Brief Summary

Oral cavity cancer (OCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, with tongue cancer being one of the most common subtypes. Patients with oral cancers can experience painful swallowing, swallowing difficulty (dysphagia), and associated weight loss long after surgery. Not only is dysphagia an independent predictor of quality of life (QoL) in cancer survivorship, it can also have a devastating impact on the health of patients resulting from complications such as pneumonia, malnutrition and feeding tube dependence. Emerging evidence suggests that patients undergoing surgery benefit from engaging with speech-language pathologists (SLPs) before problems arise, to learn swallow strategies that may become useful in their rehabilitation. This in turn has the potential to reduce complications and minimize the length of feeding tube dependency.

This study will assess the feasibility of conducting a prospective clinical trial that would evaluate the effects on patient health, function and overall benefit of early and systematic SLP speech and swallowing intervention for head and neck cancer patients planned for curative surgical treatment. We will also assess long-term changes in select clinical and patient-reported outcomes comparing their status before, and one month after, treatment.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Newly diagnosed patients with at least T2 stage tongue SCC who are planned for partial glossectomy and free flap reconstruction and are anticipated to achieve a post-operative independent oral intake.
  • Proficient in spoken and written English
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who are planned for total glossectomy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Study feasibility as measured by data fidelity for clinician assessmentsBaseline to Post-Discharge Week 5

Feasibility success will be defined as the following across all patients and compared by arm: data fidelity rate of \>80% for clinical assessments.

Study feasibility as measured by data fidelity for patient-reported outcomesBaseline to Post-Discharge Week 5

Feasibility success will be defined as the following across all patients and compared by arm: data fidelity rate of \>90% for patient reported outcomes.

Study feasibility as measured by rate of accrualBaseline to Post-Discharge Week 5

Feasibility success will be defined as the following across all patients and compared by arm: an accrual rate \>90%.

Study feasibility as measured by attritionBaseline to Post-Discharge Week 5

Feasibility success will be defined as the following across all patients and compared by arm: an attrition rate of \<10%.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Health Network

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

University Health Network
🇨🇦Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Trixie Reichardt, MHSc
Contact
4169463826
trixie.reichardt@uhnresearch.ca

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.