Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05319938
NCT05319938
Completed
Not Applicable

Clinical Evaluation of Treatment With Micro-surgical Management of Type I Multiple Gingival Recessions Using Coronally Advanced Flap With Either Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin or Concentrated Growth Factor: A Comparative Analysis

Bulent Ecevit University1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentDecember 1, 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Growth Factors, Combined Defect of
Sponsor
Bulent Ecevit University
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Complete and mean root coverage
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the clinical effects of Concentrated Growth Factor (CGF) and Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) applied together with Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) technique using a microsurgical approach in the treatment of Type I multiple gingival recessions (GR).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 1, 2018
End Date
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Bulent Ecevit University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Figen Öngöz Dede

Clinical Association Professor

Bulent Ecevit University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Systematically and periodontally healthy non-smokers
  • Presence of Cairo Recession type I gingival recession with ≥ 2 mm gingival recession depth, probing depth \<3 mm and gingival thickness (GT) ≥ 0.8 mm on both sides of the maxillary arch
  • Width of keratinized gingiva ≥ 2mm
  • Presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction
  • Full-mouth plaque index (PI) \< 20 %
  • Gingival index (GI) scores =1
  • Presence of tooth vitality
  • Absence of caries, restorations and furcation involvement in the treated area

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who had systemic problems that wound contraindicate for periodontal surgery
  • Usage of medications known to interfere with healing and to cause gingival enlargement
  • Recession defects associated with demineralization, deep abrasion, previous surgery in the defects area within the past 1 year
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Drug and alcohol abuse

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Complete and mean root coverage

Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 months of the percent of complete and mean root coverage

Percentages of root coverage and complete root coverage were calculated according to the following standard formulae. Percentage of root coverage: \[(preop. vertical gingival recession (VGR)- postop.VGR)\\ preop. VGR\] x 100 Percentage of complete root coverage: \[(teeth with complete root coverage) \\ (all treated teeth)\] x 100.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Hypersensitivity score (HS)(Change from baseline at 6 months of the hypersensitivity score)
  • Keratinized gingiva width (WKG)(Change from baseline at 6 months of keratinized gingiva width)
  • Gingival thickness(Change from baseline at 6 months of the gingival thickness)
  • Patient esthetic score (PES)(Change from baseline at 6 months of the patient esthetic score)
  • Patient comfort score (PCS)(Change from baseline at 6 months of the patient comfort score)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials