MedPath

Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Popliteal Artery Stenosis
Femoral Artery Stenosis
Popliteal Artery Occlusion
Femoral Artery Occlusion
Interventions
Device: Moxy Drug Coated Balloon
Procedure: Standard Uncoated Angioplasty Balloon
Registration Number
NCT01412541
Lead Sponsor
C. R. Bard
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the superior efficacy and non-inferior safety of the Moxy Drug Coated Balloon by direct comparison to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) catheter for treatment of stenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries.

Detailed Description

The Moxy Drug Coated Balloon is indicated for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of obstructive de novo or non-stented restenotic lesions in native femoropopliteal arteries up to 15 cm in length and ≥4.0 to ≤6.0 mm in diameter. This study will randomize approximately 476 patients who will receive either the Moxy balloon or standard balloon angioplasty at 55 global investigational sites. Subjects will be blinded to treatment until 12 months and will participate in long term follow-up for 5 years.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
532
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age;

  2. Rutherford Clinical Category 2-4;

  3. Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen;

    Angiographic Lesion Inclusion Criteria:

  4. Length ≤15 cm;

  5. Up to two focal lesions or segments within the designated 15 cm length of vessel may be treated (e.g. two discrete segments, separated by several cm, but both falling within a composite length of ≤15 cm);

  6. ≥70% stenosis by visual estimate;

  7. Lesion location starts ≥1 cm below the common femoral bifurcation and terminates distally ≤2 cm below the tibial plateau AND ≥1 cm above the origin of the TP trunk;

  8. de novo lesion(s) or non-stented restenotic lesion(s) >90 days from prior angioplasty procedure;

  9. Lesion is located at least 3 cm from any stent, if target vessel was previously stented;

  10. Target vessel diameter between ≥4 and ≤6 mm and able to be treated with available device size matrix;

  11. Successful, uncomplicated (without use of a crossing device) antegrade wire crossing of lesion;

  12. A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion (≥50% stenosis) as confirmed by angiography (treatment of target lesion acceptable after successful treatment of inflow artery lesions); NOTE: Successful inflow artery treatment is defined as attainment of residual diameter stenosis ≤30% without death or major vascular complication.

  13. At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle, free from significant (≥50%) stenosis as confirmed by angiography that has not previously been revascularized (treatment of outflow disease is NOT permitted during the index procedure);

  14. Contralateral limb lesion(s) cannot be treated within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment in order to avoid confounding complications;

  15. No other prior vascular interventions within 2 weeks before and/or planned 30 days after the protocol treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will be excluded if ANY of the following conditions apply:

  1. Pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant or men intending to father children;
  2. Life expectancy of <5 years;
  3. Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study; NOTE: Enrollment in another clinical trial during the follow up period is not allowed.
  4. History of hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months;
  5. Previous or planned surgical or interventional procedure within 2 weeks before or within 30 days after the index procedure;
  6. History of myocardial infarction (MI), thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of enrollment;
  7. Rutherford Class 0, 1, 5 or 6;
  8. Renal failure or chronic kidney disease with modification in diet in renal disease glomerular filtration rate (MDRD GFR) ≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (or serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/L within 30 days of index procedure or treated with dialysis);
  9. Prior vascular surgery of the index limb, with the exception of remote common femoral patch angioplasty separated by at least 2 cm from the target lesion;
  10. Inability to take required study medications or allergy to contrast that cannot be adequately managed with pre- and post-procedure medication;
  11. Anticipated use of IIb/IIIa inhibitor prior to randomization;
  12. Ipsilateral retrograde access;
  13. Composite lesion length is >15 cm or there is no normal proximal arterial segment in which duplex flow velocity can be measured;
  14. Significant inflow disease. Successful treatment of inflow disease allowed prior to target lesion treatment;
  15. Known inadequate distal outflow (>50 % stenosis of distal popliteal and/or all three tibial vessels), or planned future treatment of vascular disease distal to the target lesion;
  16. Sudden symptom onset, acute vessel occlusion, or acute or sub-acute thrombus in target vessel;
  17. Severe calcification that renders the lesion un-dilatable;
  18. Use of adjunctive treatment modalities (i.e. laser, atherectomy, cryoplasty, scoring/cutting balloon, etc.).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Moxy Drug Coated BalloonMoxy Drug Coated BalloonPaclitaxel coated balloon catheter
Standard Uncoated Angioplasty BalloonStandard Uncoated Angioplasty BalloonPTA Catheter
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Primary Patency of the Target Lesion at 12 Months Post Index Procedure12 months post index procedure

Primary Patency is defined as the absence of target lesion restenosis (defined by DUS peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≥2.5) and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Percentage of Participants With Composite Freedom From All-Cause Peri-Operative (≤30 Day) Death and Freedom From Index Limb Amputation, Index Limb Re-Intervention, and Index-Limb-Related Death at 12 Months Post Index Procedure12 months post index procedure

Composite of freedom from all-cause peri-operative (≤30 day) death and freedom at 1 year from the following: index limb amputation (above or below the ankle), index limb re-intervention, and index-limb-related death.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Six Minute Walk Test Distance at 6, 12, and 24 Months Compared to Baseline6, 12, and 24 months from baseline

The data bellow is presented as a Mean change in scores for the Six Minute Walk Test scores at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline.

Change in Score on the Short Form Quality of Life Measure (Physical Component) at 6, 12, and 24 Months Compared to Baseline.6, 12, and 24 months

Mean change from Baseline on the Short Form (SF-36 v2) Quality of Life Questionnaire at 6, 12, and 24 months. The SF-36 v2 United States (US) is a brief measure of general health status. The physical health measure of the test comprises four scales, that is, physical functioning (10 items), role-physical (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), and general health (5 items). The scores range between 0 and 100 (with higher scores indicating better health). In the results presented below, a positive Mean represents an increase in the average health score while a negative Mean represents a decrease in the same mean score compared to baseline measure.

Change in Quality of Life (Mental Component) on the Short-form 36 (SF-36 v2) at 6, 12, and 24 Months Compared to Baseline6, 12, and 24 months from baseline

Mean change in quality of life (mental component) on Short-form 36 (SF-36 v2) from baseline at 6, 12, and 24 months. The SF-36 v2 United States (US) is a brief measure of general health status. The mental health measure comprises four scales, that is, vitality (4 items), social functioning (2 items), role-emotional (3 items), and mental health (5 items). The scores range from 0 to 100 (with higher scores indicating better health). In the results presented below, a positive Mean represents an increase in the average health score while a negative Mean represents a decrease in the same mean score compared to baseline measure.

Number of Acute Device Success at Time of Index ProcedureAt time of Index Procedure

Device Success was defined as the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the study device(s) as intended at the intended target lesion, without balloon rupture or inflation/deflation abnormalities and a successful withdrawal of the study system.

Number of Participants With Technical and Procedural SuccessAt time of Index Procedure

Technical Success is defined as successful access and deployment of the device and visual estimate of ≤30% diameter residual stenosis during the index procedure without deployment of a bailout stent.

Procedural Success is defined as attainment of ≤30% residual stenosis in the treatment area by independent core lab analysis without serious adverse events during the index procedure.

Number of Participants With Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) Clinical Patency at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure6, 12, and 24 months post index porcedure

DUS Clinical Patency defined as DUS PSVR \<2.5 without prior clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Improvement in Rutherford Classification Scores at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure Compared to Baseline6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure

The endpoint summarizes the change in index-limb Rutherford Classification of participants from baseline through 24 months. Data is presented as shift from baseline Rutherford Classification data using the following categories: 1) Improvement, 2) Same, and 3) Worsened.

Number of Participants With Primary Patency at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure

Primary Patency is defined as the absence of target lesion restenosis (defined by core lab adjudication or strict application of PSVR thresholds) and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).

Number of Participants With Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Clinically-driven at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure
Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) Scores at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure Compared to Baseline.6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure

The WIQ assesses 3 categories of activities that include 1) walking distance, 2) stair-climbing, and 3) walking speed. Each question requires participants to rate their degree of difficulty with the activity on a scale of 0 (unable) to 4 (no problem). Final scores range from 0% to 100%, with lower percentages indicating higher levels of difficulties with activities.The results below represent the mean differences in total Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) scores at 6, 12, and 24 months, compared to baseline assessment scores.

Number of Participants With Alternative Primary Patency at 6, 12, and 24 Months Post Index Procedure6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure

Percentage of subjects with Alternative Primary Patency based on alternative definitions of duplex ultrasound (DUS) peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) \<2.0 and \<3.0 at 6, 12, and 24 months post index procedure. DUS PSVR was calculated by dividing the maximum peak systolic velocity (PSV) from the stenosis by the PSV from the nearest segment of normal artery above the site of increase.

Change in Resting Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) at 6, 12, and 24 Months Compared to Baseline6, 12, and 24 months from baseline

Mean change from baseline values. The Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) is defined as a ratio of ankle to brachial (upper arm) artery systolic blood pressure and aims at determining how well the blood is flowing in the legs.

Number of Participants With All Cause Death, Amputation, Target Vessel Revascularization, Reintervention for Thrombosis, Major and Minor Vascular Complications, and Readmission for Cardiovascular Events at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months PPI.1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post index procedure

Amputation defined as above the ankle free survival (AFS). PPI = Post index procedure.

Change in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EuroQol -5D) Scores at 6, 12, and 24 Months Compared to Baseline.6, 12, and 24 months

Mean change in EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline. The EurolQol-5D system rates quality of life using five dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels of ratings, that is, no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems that can be selected. A visual scale allows participants to report their own perception of their health status. The overall scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Please note that the data in the table below represent the mean changes in overall scores for each group compared to their baseline data.

Number of Subjects With Freedom From Death, Index-Limb Amputation, and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) at 30 Days Post Index Porcedure30 days post index procedure

Number of subjects with Freedom from all-cause death, index limb amputation above the ankle and Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) (VIVA Safety Endpoint)

Number of Participants With Composite of Freedom From All-Cause Perioperative (<30 Day) Death and Freedom From the Following at 1,6, 24, 36, 48, and 60 Months: Index Limb Amputation, Index Limb Re-intervention, and Index Limb Related Death1, 6, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post index procedure

Trial Locations

Locations (53)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

St. Joseph's Hospital

🇺🇸

Orange, California, United States

Washington Cardiology Center

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

Allen County Cardiology

🇺🇸

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Good Samaritan Hospital

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Interventional Cardiolgists of Gainesville

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Imelda Ziekenhuis

🇧🇪

Bonheiden, Belgium

Greenville Memorial Hospital

🇺🇸

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Medical University of Graz

🇦🇹

Graz, Austria

Cleveland Clinic

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Munroe Regional Medical Center

🇺🇸

Ocala, Florida, United States

Edward Heart

🇺🇸

Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, United States

Mount Sinai Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Medical University of Vienna

🇦🇹

Vienna, Austria

Wake Heart and Vascular

🇺🇸

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Wellmont Cardiology Services

🇺🇸

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Advocate Christ Medical Center

🇺🇸

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Forrest General Hospital

🇺🇸

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Jobst Vascular Institute

🇺🇸

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Herz-Zentrum

🇩🇪

Bad Krozingen, Germany

Mercy Hosptial

🇺🇸

Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States

New York University Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

East Tennessee Heart Consultants

🇺🇸

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Promise Regional Medical Center

🇺🇸

Hutchinson, Kansas, United States

St. Francis Heart & Vascular Center

🇺🇸

Topeka, Kansas, United States

St. John's Hospital

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

St. Vincent Heart Center of Indianapolis

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Detroit Medical Center

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

North County Radiology Medial Group Inc.

🇺🇸

Oceanside, California, United States

Medical Center of the Rockies

🇺🇸

Loveland, Colorado, United States

Yale New Haven Hospital

🇺🇸

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

University of California Davis

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Heart and Vascular Institute

🇺🇸

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Deborah Heart and Lung Center

🇺🇸

Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States

Christ Hospital / The Lindner Clinical Trial Center

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

Univesrity of Toledo Medical Center

🇺🇸

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Baptist DeSoto in Southaven

🇺🇸

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Austin Heart P.A.

🇺🇸

Austin, Texas, United States

Flanders Medical Research Program

🇧🇪

Dendermonde, Belgium

Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Jewish Hospital

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Diakonissenanstalt zu Flensburg

🇩🇪

Flensburg, Germany

University Leipzig

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Germany

University of Tübingen

🇩🇪

Tübingen, Germany

Columbia Universtiy Medical Center

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Massachusetts Genearl Hospital

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Michigan Heart

🇺🇸

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Mid Ohio Cardiology and Vascular Consultants

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

University Magdeburg

🇩🇪

Magdeburg, Germany

Methodist Medical Center

🇺🇸

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Cardiovascular Associates

🇺🇸

Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath