MedPath

Implant for Walking After Stroke

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Hemiplegia
Stroke
Gait, Hemiplegic
Interventions
Device: IRS-8
Device: IST 12 & IST 16
Registration Number
NCT05740540
Lead Sponsor
MetroHealth Medical Center
Brief Summary

This is a device study that will evaluate the effect of an implanted stimulator on improving walking in stroke survivors. There are two phases in the study: 1) Screening - this phase determines if the individual is a good candidate to receive an implanted system, 2) Implantation, controller development, and evaluation - this phase includes installing the device and setting the individual up for home use, creating advanced controllers for walking and evaluating the effect of the device over several months.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of neural stimulation for improving walking after stroke. Participants will undergo surgery to implant a stimulator and electrodes to activate muscles used during walking. The device delivers electrical pulses to the nerves causing the muscles to contract to perform functional movements. The system coordinates assistance based on external sensors. After receiving the implanted device, participants undergo training to use the device to assist walking. Evaluations are completed prior to surgery as well after training and at later follow up sessions.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
6
Inclusion Criteria
  • At least 6-months post stroke
  • Age 21 to 75 years old
  • Able to ambulate, but does not require the assistance of more than one person
  • Walk slower than 0.8m/s during a 10m walk test
  • Lower extremity Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) <= 20
  • Reduced peak hip, knee and/or ankle range of motion during stance or swing phases
  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) <= 2 at the above joints during passive flexion and extension
  • Innervated and excitable lower extremity and trunk musculature
  • Appropriate body habitus (height and weight within acceptable limits as determined by study physician)
  • Adequate social support and stability
  • Willingness to comply with follow-up procedures
  • Neurologically stable as determined by a physician
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-English speaking
  • Significant range of motion limitations (lacking hip extension, etc.)
  • History of spontaneous fractures or other evidence of excessively low bone density
  • Acute orthopedic problems (severe scoliosis, joint dislocations, etc.)
  • Medical complications (cardiac abnormalities, skin breakdowns, uncontrolled seizures, immunological/pulmonary/renal/circulatory compromise, additional neurologic conditions etc.)
  • Cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
  • Uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension
  • Presence of a demand pacemaker or cardiac defibrillator
  • Pregnancy
  • Complications of stroke that result in an increased risk of falls (apraxia, uncompensated hemineglect, hemianopsia etc.)
  • Significant history of repeated falls
  • Severely impaired cognition and communication
  • Any other medical or psychological condition that would be a contraindication
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Implantation, controller development, and evaluationIRS-8This phase includes installing the device and setting the individual up for home use, creating advanced controllers for walking and evaluating the effect of the device over several months.
Implantation, controller development, and evaluationIST 12 & IST 16This phase includes installing the device and setting the individual up for home use, creating advanced controllers for walking and evaluating the effect of the device over several months.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in Gait speedbaseline, ~18 weeks post implant, ~44 week post implant

The 10mWT is used to assess walking speed in meters/second (m/s) over a short distance.

Gait speed is how we're evaluating whether the advanced controller works better than a simple generic triggering approach.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in Usability Rating Scale (URS)baseline, ~18 weeks post implant, ~44-week post implant

participants will rate the task on a seven-point scale from "very easy" (3) to "very difficult" (-3). Difficulty will be assessed after the 10 m walk test

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

MetroHealth Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath