MedPath

A Comparison of an Ultra-thin and Standard Colonoscope in Achieving Caecal Intubation

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
First Colonoscopy Examination
Interventions
Procedure: Standard Colonoscopy
Procedure: Ultra-thin colonoscopy
Registration Number
NCT01142167
Lead Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to study the caecal intubation rate of a prototype ultra-thin colonoscope compared to a standard colonoscope and to study usefulness of this new colonoscope as a rescue instrument for failed initial colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope and to study the patient satisfaction scores using a validated endoscopy GHAA-9 for a new prototype colonoscope as compared to a standard colonoscope.

Detailed Description

Colonoscopy is a common endoscopic procedure, widely used for the investigation of lower gastrointestinal tract diseases manifesting as altered bowel habit, per rectal bleeding and abdominal pain. It is used to diagnose colonic polyps, colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease to name a few examples.

Colorectal cancer screening has been shown to decrease colorectal cancer. Despite this the uptake by the general population is suboptimal.

A new prototype colonoscope from Olympus with an additional distal bending section was designed. The investigators hypothesize that its performance characteristics will be similar to a standard colonoscope with patient tolerability.

This randomised control trial aims to invite patients attending their first outpatient colonoscopy and who are able to provide informed consent.(so they have had no prior experience) to assess the completion rate, patient and endoscopist satisfaction.

Patients with prior colorectal surgery or previous colonoscopy were excluded.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1121
Inclusion Criteria
  • First outpatient colonoscopy
  • Able to provide informed consent
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to provide consent
  • Prior colon surgery (except appendectomy)
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard ColonoscopyStandard ColonoscopyColonoscopy with standard instrument
Ultra-thin colonoscopyUltra-thin colonoscopyNew prototype scope
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Successful Caecal intubation12 weeks

Success of Caecal intubation for the ultra-thin colonoscope vs standard colonoscope

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Caecal intubation time12 weeks

Caecal intubation time Ultra-thin colonsocope vs standard colonoscope

Patient Satisfaction and Pain score12 weeks

Patient tolerability Ultra-thin vs standard colonoscope

Endoscopist satisfaction12 weeks

Ease of use prototype scope vs standard colonoscope

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital

🇨🇳

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath