MedPath

Pioglitazone vs. Insulin Glargine in the Treatment of Secondary Drug Failure in Type 2 Diabetes

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes
Secondary Drug Failure
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00609856
Lead Sponsor
Skane University Hospital
Brief Summary

Pioglitazone and insulin glargine are equally effective in achieving glycemic control in secondary drug failure of type 2 diabetes but the mechanisms of actions are different.

Detailed Description

The present study was undertaken to assess differences in how insulin glargine vs. pioglitazone affect:

* Beta-cell function as measured by proinsulin/insulin, homeostasis model assessment for insulin secretion (HOMA β-cell) and glucagon stimulated C-peptide test

* Insulin sensitivity as measured by adiponectin, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and insulin tolerance test and

* Surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease as measured by BNP, NT-pro BNP and plasma lipid profile as add-on therapy in patients with T2D and secondary drug failure. The patients' satisfaction with each treatment was also surveyed.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • type 2 diabetes
  • inadequately controlled on 50% of maximal-dose of an insulin secretagogue and metformin
Exclusion Criteria
  • heart failure (NYHA II-IV)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1pioglitazonePioglitazone
2insulin glargineInsulin glargine
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effect of pioglitazone vs. insulin glargine on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity26 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effect of pioglitazone vs. insulin glargine on BNP26 weeks

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Malmö University Hospital

🇸🇪

Malmö, Sweden

Malmö University Hospital
🇸🇪Malmö, Sweden

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.