Polyaxial Locking Plates in Treating Distal Humeral Fractures

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Distal Humerus Fracture
• Interventions: Procedure: Medartis; Procedure: Synthes

• Registration Number: NCT03272490
• Lead Sponsor: Technical University of Munich

Brief Summary

20 patients with distal humeral fractures (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) were included in the current study since 2014. After completing the randomization plan, patients were distributed into two groups for different variable angle locking plates (DePuy Synthes VA-LCP vs. Medartis Aptus Elbow). Clinical and radiological follow-ups were conducted 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.

Detailed Description

Before study initiation the approval of the local ethics committee of (Trial Number 253/14) was obtained. The clinical trial included 20 patients with fractures of the distal humerus recruited from a level-one university trauma centre. Patient recruitment was conducted between 03/2014 and 12/2015. Fractures of the distal humerus, as defined by the AO classification system (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3), were included in this study as they were identified by the treating surgeon being applicable for locking plate treatment and after written informed consent of the patients was obtained. All patients were randomized following a randomization plan (Randlist, DatInf GmbH, Tübingen, Germany) for either being treated with the DePuy Synthes VA-LCP 2.7/3.5 mm (DePuy Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) or with the Medartis Aptus Elbow system 2.0/3.8 mm (Medartis, Basel, Switzerland). Both systems include anatomically preshaped, polyaxial angular stable locking plates in various sizes. Angle stable screw positioning with the freedom of +/- 15° off-axis screw placement gives the surgeon a large variety in both systems.

The inclusion criteria involve all patients from the age of 18 to 95 years who suffered from a distal humeral fracture (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) that had to undergo operative treatment. The exclusion criteria involve all under-aged patients (\< 18 years), pregnant patients and patients with a mental disorder as well as patients under comprehensive legal support. In addition, pathological fractures had been excluded from the study.

Surgical technique

All patients were operated by experienced upper extremity surgeons. The mean interval between injury and operation was 2.4 days (range 0-12 days). General anaesthesia was used in all cases and a single dose of 1.5 mg cephalosporin was given preoperatively for prophylaxis. Patients were positioned in prone position with the injured arm on a radiolucent, small padded arm holder. Under tourniquet control, the posterior approach (Bryan-Morrey) to the distal humerus was performed in all cases. Additional olecranon osteotomy was performed in 7 cases (3x DePuy Synthes vs. 4x Medartis Aptus Elbow) presenting with AO type 13 C2 and AO type 13 C3 fractures. Postoperatively, physiotherapy was initiated using the same rehabilitation protocol for both groups. Passive and active assisted ROM was permitted immediately without limitations, while weight bearing was restricted for 6 weeks.

Follow-up evaluation

All patients were initially followed-up 6 weeks after operation. Additional follow-ups were performed 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The follow-up examinations were carried out by an independent investigator not involved in patient´s initial surgical treatment (MC). After the assessment of pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) was documented, ROM and collateral ligament stability were documented on standardized scoring sheets. For subjective evaluation, patients rated their satisfaction for elbow use on a scale of 1 to 6 (1-highly satisfied; 2-satisfied; 3-moderate; 4-sufficient; 5-unsatisfied; 6-very unsatisfied). Moreover, sensomotoric disturbances and postoperative complications were recorded. For functional upper extremity and elbow scoring the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were comprised. Postoperative x-rays were evaluated with special respect to bony healing, secondary loss of reduction and heterotopic ossifications.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software SigmaStat (version 3.5; Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA). The scores at certain time points were compared with an independent t test after a normality check had been passed and equal variances had been detected. Normal distributed data with unequal variances would have been compared with Welch's t test. Arbitrarily data was tested with Mann-Whitney U test. The significance level was set at p= 0.05.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2014-02-05
• Primary Completion: 2017-06-06
• Study Completion: 2017-07-01
• Study First Submitted: 2017-08-31
• Status Verified: 2017-09
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-09-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-09-01
• Study First Posted: 2017-09-05
• Last Update Posted: 2017-09-05

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

• The inclusion criteria involve all patients from the age of 18 to 95 years who suffered from a distal humeral fracture (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) that had to undergo operative treatment

Exclusion Criteria

• The exclusion criteria involve all under-aged patients (< 18 years), pregnant patients and patients with a mental disorder as well as patients under comprehensive legal support. In addition, pathological fractures had been excluded from the study.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Medartis	Medartis	Surgery using the Medartis Implant
Synthes	Synthes	Surgery using the Synthes implant

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS)	12 months	clinical and functional outcome