Prevention of Weight Loss in Long Term Care Veterans

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Malnutrition

Interventions: Behavioral: Immediate Intervention Group
Behavioral: Delayed Intervention Group

Registration Number: NCT00841412

Lead Sponsor: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Brief Summary: Background: Numerous studies have shown that many LTC residents receive inadequate staff assistance with eating, which places them at risk for under-nutrition, dehydration and weight loss. Moreover, improvements in feeding assistance care have been shown to improve residents' daily food and fluid consumption and weight loss outcomes.

Objectives: The purpose of this program evaluation project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to improve nutritional care within the constraints of existing staffing resources.

Methods: A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in one federal and one state VA LTC facility. Research staff collected baseline measures related to nutritional care processes and resident outcomes. All LTC units in each of the two sites were divided into two groups for program implementation. The program was implemented with staff and residents on the units in the immediate intervention group; while, the delayed intervention group remained in usual care and continued to be monitored monthly for all care process and resident outcome measures.

Status: This project ended 10/1/13. Five published papers resulted from this study.

Detailed Description: Background:

Numerous studies have shown that many long term care (LTC) residents receive inadequate staff assistance with eating, which places them at risk for under-nutrition, dehydration and weight loss. Moreover, improvements in feeding assistance care have been shown to improve residents' daily food and fluid consumption and weight loss outcomes. However, these improvements have only been achieved through the use of research staff as opposed to indigenous LTC staff due to staffing resource limitations that exist in most LTC facilities. The purpose of this program evaluation project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to improve nutritional care within the constraints of existing staffing resources.

Objectives:

The PI of this proposal has developed standardized assessment, monitoring and staffing needs projection tools that can be used by long-term care (LTC) providers to improve feeding assistance care delivery and unintentional weight loss outcomes. The primary objective of this project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to (1) identify residents in need of feeding assistance, (2) effectively monitor daily care delivery; and, (3) utilize existing, non-nursing staff for some mealtime tasks to improve care.

Methods:

A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in one federal and one state VA long-term care (LTC) facility. Research staff collected baseline measures related to organizational characteristics, including staffing, nutritional care processes and resident outcomes including oral food and fluid intake and weight status. All LTC units in each of the two sites were divided into two groups for program implementation purposes (for a total of 4 groups across the 2 sites) based on the proximity of a unit to other units, resident and staff characteristics. The program was implemented with staff and residents on the units in the first site/group; while, the second site/group remained in usual care and continued to be monitored monthly for all care process and resident outcome measures. Research staff trained LTC staff in the implementation of program protocols during a 12-week intervention period. Research staff then monitored LTC staff implementation of the program monthly following intervention to determine the sustainability of the program in the absence of research staff. All staff training and monitoring was repeated for the LTC units in groups three and four. The intent of this program evaluation study was to determine the effectiveness and cost of translating efficacious research protocols into care practice to improve the nutritional status of LTC veterans.

Status: This study is officially complete.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 222

Inclusion Criteria

Long-stay,
free of feeding tube,
not receiving hospice care,
not on a planned weight loss diet,
able to speak English

Exclusion Criteria

short stay/rehab only
feeding tube
hospice
planned weight loss diet

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Immediate Intervention Group	Immediate Intervention Group	Immediate Intervention: Long term care units assigned to the Immediate Intervention group were first to receive the staff training and management intervention to improve nutritional care processes.
Delayed Intervention Group	Delayed Intervention Group	Delayed Intervention: Long term care units assigned to the Delayed Intervention group were monitored under usual care conditions to serve as a control for the Immediate Intervention group. Then, these units received the staff training and management intervention at a later date.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Quality of Feeding Assistance Care Processes	3 month intervention and 3 month follow up periods	Research staff observed each participant during six meals per study phase. Research staff documented the total amount of staff time spent providing feeding assistance and each type of assistance per resident per meal. These data were used to construct standardized "feeding assistance care quality indicators" wherein the number of resident meal observations was variable. For example, one indicator was defined as: Percentage of meals during which resident intake was below 50% and staff offered and alternative to the served meal". Thus, the denominator for total number of observed meals scored varied by indicator. There were multiple indicators; thus, there is inadequate space to provide an adequate description of each measure and the corresponding scoring rules here. Please refer to published papers for a complete description of all outcome measures.

Secondary Outcome Measures