Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06046144
NCT06046144
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of 3 in Vivo Microscopic Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Pigmented Tumors. Monocentric Retrospective Study of 170 Tumors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne1 site in 1 country161 target enrollmentNovember 2, 2022

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Enrollment
161
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare the the relevance of each technique for the diagnostic of pigmented lesions.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is the reference in vivo imaging technique for identifying malignant melanocytic tumors prior to surgical excision. However, it is not widely used due to its high cost and highly technical and time-consuming nature.

In addition to Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), it currently use 2 less expensive dermatoscopes that also allow in vivo diagnosis: super-high magnification dermoscopy (D400) and Fluorescence-Advanced videodermatoscopy (FAV).

Detailed Description

Several studies have demonstrated their interest in the in vivo diagnosis of melanocytic tumors, but without any comparison between these methods. In our current practice, many patients have benefited from these 3 imaging modalities for benign and malignant lesions. Therefore, our aim is to analyze these images and compare their performance in the diagnosis of benign and malignant pigmented lesions.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2, 2022
End Date
May 1, 2023
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a pigmented skin lesion of more than 3mm diameter which have benefited systematically of all 3 imaging techniques at the same time, followed by either a surgical excision or annual imaging monitoring.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Bad quality images
  • Insufficient number of images
  • Uncertain diagnosis given by the pathologist

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare the the relevance of each technique for the diagnostic of pigmented lesions.

Time Frame: Day 1

The nature of the tumor is diagnosed by the imaging technique.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of performance of imaging techniques(Day 1)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials