FES VS Constrained Induced MT Recovery and Spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Ischemic Patients
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Constrained Induced Movement TherapyDiagnostic Test: Functional Electrical Stimulation
- Registration Number
- NCT05854121
- Lead Sponsor
- Superior University
- Brief Summary
To determines the effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation versus Constrained Induced Movement Therapy for motor recovery and spasticity in Upper Limb Hemiparetic Chronic Ischemic Stroke Patients
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 56
Clinically diagnosed chronic ischemic stroke patients. Patients from both genders Age 45 year and older. Patients having upper limb spasticity equal to 2 or less than 2 according to modified ash worth scale.
Patients having active cognitive scoring on Mini Mental State Examination.
Having pacemaker and other stimulation devices. Prosthesis of bones, joints in targeted region of treatment. Patients presenting the history of recurrent stroke. Patients having history of bilateral hemiparesis. Co-morbid history of tumor, heart disease, hypertensive. Patients presenting with skin lesions, wounds, discoloration will be excluded from this research.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Constrained Induced Movement Therapy Constrained Induced Movement Therapy - Functional Electrical Stimulation Functional Electrical Stimulation -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Motor Function assessment test 6 Months Scale Modified Ash worth 6 Months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Shadman Medical Care
🇵🇰Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan