Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT02280213
NCT02280213
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Miller, Macintosh, Phillips and Wis-Hipple Blades During Infant Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Trial

International Institute of Rescue Research and Education1 site in 1 country145 target enrollmentNovember 2014
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsIntubation

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Intubation
Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Enrollment
145
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to intubation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Comparison of four laryngoscope blades (Miller, Macintosh, Phillips and Wis-Hipple) for infant intubation during resuscitation with and without chest compressions.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2014
End Date
January 2015
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
International Institute of Rescue Research and Education
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Lukasz Szarpak

Lukasz Szarpak

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • •paramedics
  • •no clinical experience in infant intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • •not meet the above criteria
  • •wrist or low back diseases
  • •pregnancy.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to intubation

Time Frame: 1 day

time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Success of intubation(1 day)
  • Ease of Use(1 day)
  • POGO score(1 day)
  • Cormack-Lehane grading(1 day)
  • dental compression(1 day)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of the Effects of Truview Laryngoscopy and Macintosh Larygonscopy on Intubation Difficulty Score, Intubation Duration and Intubation Quality in Pediatric Patients Between 2-12 YearsAll the Pediatric Patients Needed Intubation for Surgery
NCT02069444Ankara University100
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Novel Indirect Laryngoscopes to the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization.Immobilization
NCT01032460University College Hospital Galway90
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing the Laryngoscopy View Using Miller and Macintosh Laryngoscopy Blades in Infants Under Two Years of AgePercent of Glottic Opening
NCT01717872State University of New York at Buffalo50
Unknown
Not Applicable
Direct Laryngoscopy During Cervical TraumaTrauma
NCT02292693International Institute of Rescue Research and Education80
Completed
Not Applicable
Intubation During ResuscitationIntubationCardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT02277951International Institute of Rescue Research and Education141