Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Tooth Diseases
- Registration Number
- NCT04324008
- Lead Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch\&rinse).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
Inclusion Criteria
- having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits
- absence of previously placed restorations
- having antagonist teeth
Exclusion Criteria
- poor gingival health
- uncontrolled, rampant caries
- bruxism
- removable partial dentures
- xerostomia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical performances of different flowable resin composite two years Two year results according to USPHS criteria
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hacettepe University
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Hacettepe University🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey