Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 入组人数
- 28
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Clinical performances of different flowable resin composite
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch&rinse).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •having no medical or behavioral problems preventing then from attending review visits
- •absence of previously placed restorations
- •having antagonist teeth
排除标准
- •poor gingival health
- •uncontrolled, rampant caries
- •removable partial dentures
- •xerostomia
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical performances of different flowable resin composite
时间窗: two years
Two year results according to USPHS criteria
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dr. Fatma Dilşad Öz
Assistant Professor
Hacettepe University