MedPath

To compare the results of gall bladder retrieval from two different ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
Registration Number
CTRI/2019/02/017772
Lead Sponsor
Armed Forces Medical College
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

16-80 years old patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gall bladder diseases (symptomatic gall stones, GB polyps).

Patients in whom informed consent could be obtained

Exclusion Criteria

Acute cholecystitis.

Empyema gall bladder.

Mucocele of GB.

Suspected/ proven malignancy of GB.

Patients in whom laparascopic cholecystectomy has to be converted in open procedure.

Patients who are chronic users of analgesic medicines and steroids.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the post operative pain at the port site in both groupsTimepoint: Pain score will be graded bybthe patients with VAS score (0-10) at 6hrs, 12 hrs, 24hrs and 48 hrs following surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1. To assess the ease of retrieval of Gall bladder. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>2. To assess the time taken for retrieval of gall bladder following dissection from liver bed. <br/ ><br>3. To assess the incidence of port site infectionTimepoint: The difficulty in GB retrieval will be graded by the operative surgeon by using VAS score(0- easy retrieval, 10 - very difficult retrieval)To be assessed immediately after the surgery <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>The time taken for the removal of gall bladder following dissection to retrieval in minutes.To be assessed at the time of surgery <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Port site infection to be graded by South Hampton wound scoring system on day 7, 15 and 06 weeks following surgery.
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath